Skip to content

NHS CUI Design Guide Workstream

NHS CUI Design Guide Workstream

Source PDF: cuidesignguide.pdf

Release 4 Handover Requirements

Prepared For NHS Connecting for Health

Thursday, 1 March 2007

Version 1.0.0.0 Baseline

Prepared By mscui@microsoft.com

Contributors

Henry Dowlen David Allan-Smith

James Fone

Igor Laketic

This document has been prepared for the NHS CUI project and is subject to the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement between Microsoft and the Secretary of State for Health in respect of the project. The document may contain information or work product that is Microsoft pre-existing work and/or information or work product that has been created specially for the purposes of the project.

© Microsoft Corporation and Crown Copyright 2007

2 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

RIDAssumptions / Requirementsn e q
ati y R n o ce Part cation yase
Status Plain English Example Source Conflicts Conditional Document/ Source Entered with … on … Adoption Date Source Event Reference By S AHHBRGG M f p aaeeee t a f e nnq e nn n o r c ddee a r irr f oog ii ei H vve cc c a H ee nT rr m a C H::l dae i nas onn ANdnti vk ceodc es cv R g/ o r al ee e ov D r ti pq i e t a r a r Dataset per Item Exam Handspl he a kD eataset Task M anagem Tim ent e Com Item ponent Lists Good Practice E UDi n psc dco ao t u i ur nra a gg ge em me en nt/ t SP Hia at ni nge l dn e o t vI P ed a rt e in et ni tfi M Haul nti dp ol ve er Patient Priority Il SRA l cad ut ei d st r no re an a r s t i al s e oee d d …i Ci na n t eR ge ol re
Col4Col5Col6Col7Col8Col9Col10Col11Col12Col13Col14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20Col21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26Col27Col28Col29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34Col35Col36Col37Col38
1Users can view a ‘per patient’ summary
of information held in the patient’s
record. This summary is appropriate for
the purpose of handover.
AdoptedPatients have a summary dataset that is
appropriate for the purpose of handover. This can
be viewed by users. That is to say, handover
requires something extra than just easy access to
the ‘full’ patient record.
See Example Handover Datasets in the
supporting document_NHS CUI Design_
Guide Handover Requirements Supporting
Document.
xxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopL45, V1, V4HD
2Users can view different ‘per item’
handover information summaries
according to the user’s context.
AdoptedThe summary dataset per item (e.g. a patient)
appropriate for handover will vary according to
context e.g. role, care setting, purpose of
handover, user grade, speciality, etc. Users in
each different context see the dataset appropriate
to them. Note: This does NOT involve defining
what SET of items is available i.e. the inclusion
criteria for the patient list. The datasets will not be
defined in these requirements.
See the variation in the Example Handover
Datasets, e.g. MIST acronym from
paramedic handover, WEST acronym
from Air Traffic Control.
xxxxxxxxEssentialRID 4User researchL45, V1, V4HD
3From each item’s summary, users can
easily access more information about
each item e.g. the ‘full’ patient record.
AdoptedIf a user is viewing the summary for a handover
item (e.g. patient), then they can quickly and easily
get to more information about that item e.g. link to
the ‘full’ patient record available in that context.
A link to the ‘full’ patient record.xxxxxxxxEssentialUser researchL45, V1, V4HD
4User’s different contexts are recognised
by the system.
AdoptedAs the information displayed will vary according to
user’s roles, responsibilities, care setting, speciality
and so on, the system will have to be able to
recognise these.

Ward manager, staff nurse, district nurse,
doctor day shift, doctor on call,
paediatrician, surgeon, GP and so on.
xxxxxxxEssentialUser researchL45, V1, V4HD
6Users can view the information used in
handover on a variety of sizes and types
of Display.

Adopted
xxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL2, L3, V1HD
7Data is displayed according to the
relevant NHS data standards, e.g.
format for date display.
AdoptedSome data will have NHS standards that apply to
how it is displayed e.g. patient name, date of birth
and so on. Data displayed for use in handover
must conform to these standards.
CUI date display.xxxxxxEssentialObservationV1HD
8Users can view all of the items that they
are responsible for.
AdoptedRelates to RID 63. Includes: items (e.g. patients),
regular tasks, specific tasks.
xxxxxxxEssentialUser researchL5HD
9All users can update the documentation
used in handover, during handover. In
addition, these updates should be
reflected in the patient record, i.e. in the
source data.
AdoptedUsers giving, receiving and present in handover
may need to update the documentation used in
handover. The degree to how simultaneous this is
must be further defined. As usual, these updates
are performed on the ‘source data’ not just a
’handover copy’.
xxxxxxxRecommendedMeetingCUIHD
10Users can ‘discharge’ a patient from the
system, even if that patient has
outstanding tasks. These outstanding
tasks are identified and flagged by the
system so that they can be handled
appropriately by the health professional
organising patient’s discharge.
AdoptedPatients may leave a clinical location with certain
tasks intentionally not completed. The system
needs to allow for patients to move location (which
may be outside of the system). Decision support
should operate on these tasks, and incomplete
tasks should be handled appropriately e.g. as an
outpatient.
Patient is to be discharged from the ward
without a social services appointment
having been finalised. The staff will
arrange this appointment after the patient
has left.
xxxxxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD
11Users can clearly and uniquely identify
patients using standard NHS patient
identifiers. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
AdoptedThere needs to be clear identification of which
patient is being handed-over in both the
documentation used in handover and any verbal
handover. NHS standards on patient identification
should be followed here.
Possible set: (full name, dob, NHS
number, location)
xxxxxxxxxxxEssentialMeetingV1HD
12Users are clear about who has
responsibility for the items involved in
handover, during and after the
handover, especially at the point that
responsibility is transferred. An item
cannot be ‘no-ones’ responsibility.
AdoptedUser’s care is clear about who is responsible for
the items being handed over (e.g. patient’s) at all
stages. Relates to generic requirement 64.
xxxxxxxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD
14Users can view the documentation used
in handover from the point of view of
other users, e.g. nurses can see a
doctor’s view of the handover
information.

Adopted
When there is handover between two roles,
agendas and views about the patient may differ, in
some cases considerably. Both users will need to
be aware of the other’s perspective. Related to
RID 90. Doctors and nurses often look at, and use
each other’s handover documents to help them
structure their work and communicate.
Handover between two roles. A junior
doctor being able to apply their
consultant’s summary view on the same
set of in-patients during a hospital stay, in
order to assess whether they have done
the necessary tasks.
xxxxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchV2, L45HD
15Users can view information that comes
from any relevant NHS system, that is,
NHS/Social care systems are
interoperable.
AdoptedData must be immediately transferable/available to
the receiving clinicians once handover has taken
place, and in some cases beforehand.
xxxxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD
18Users can monitor the documentation
used in handover when they are
physically away from the place of
handover and the items being handed
over. Remote users can also be aware
of items they have been made
responsible for while located elsewhere
AdoptedSome users may want to remotely monitor the
items that are under the responsibility of their team
or that might be/have been their responsibility. This
can be done by being able to monitor both the
documentation used in handover. Relates to RID
118. They will also need to be able to be aware of
items that they have become responsible for e.g.
new tasks.

A paediatric SHO working down in A&E
wants to be able to monitor the patients on
the children’s ward and to see if they have
been allocated any tasks in their absence
from the ward.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationV3, V4HD

3 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

20Users must record the handover event
and the transfer of responsibility (the
’handshake’). The documentation of this
is clear to all users involved in the
handover. Users can still record this
even if the handover is: 1)
asynchronous, or 2) synchronous but
not face to face.
AdoptedThe transfer of responsibility is documented, and
the handover event is documented (assuming that
these are the same thing). Though handovers in
general should be synchronous and face to face, in
some situations this is not possible. In these
situations a documented transfer of responsibility
must still occur.
GP out of hours at night sees a patient and
needs to let the regular day time GP know
the events in the morning. Currently a fax
is used, but it could be an email with read
receipt.
Col6Col7xCol9Col10xxCol13Col14Col15Col16xCol18Col19Col20Col21Col22Col23Col24xxCol27RecommendedCol29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34MeetingCUICol37HD
21Users can record which user marked a
task as complete. With the option for
more information e.g. who vouched for
this.
AdoptedTask management. Who marked a task as
complete is important, however they may not be
the user who actually completed it (or vouched for
it to be complete).
xxxxxxxxRecommendedMeetingCUIHD
22The user receiving the handover is in
control of the transfer of responsibility in
the handover.
AdoptedThe transfer of responsibility can only occur once
the user receiving the handover is happy to take
responsibility.
In some situations in air traffic control, the
user giving handover cannot leave until the
user receiving handover physically takes
responsibility by removing the outgoing
user’s headphones.
xxxxxRecommendedMeetingCUIHD
23Users can schedule their own or others’
tasks based on the priorities identified
during the handover.
AdoptedCategorising patients into groups, based
on who needs to be seen first on-call.
xxxxxxxxEssentialInferredV4HD
24Users can categorise patients into
groups based on different variables e.g.
location, team, severity.
AdoptedThis does not necessarily mean ‘grouping by’; the
groups could be separate lists and so on.
Various scales (e.g. MEWS, Waterlow),
responsibilities, geography, resuscitation
status, awaiting results, due for admission,
due for discharge, others’ responsibility
and so on.
xxxxxxxxxEssentialInferredV4HD
25Users can view and record the item’s
current location. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
AdoptedWhich ward and bed a patient is in.xxxxxxxxxEssentialUser researchV4, L45HD
26Users are supported in having
handovers involving a large group of
people from different roles.
AdoptedTypically MDT meetings. Relates to RID 1.
Necessary to have adaptable summary of patients
and handover lists.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationV4HD
27At the handover events and transfer of
responsibility, users must record /
confirm: date, time, place, user handing
over, user being handed over to, other
users present, satisfaction (or
otherwise) with the handover.
AdoptedIt is likely that much of this information would be
automatically captured by the system and therefore
would not need to be entered by the users, only
confirmed.
xxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD
28Users can record information that is
uniquely part of the handover process.
This is distinct from the information that
is being handed over.
AdoptedUsers may need to record information about the
reason for the handover, as well as the information
that they are handing over. This information will be
unique to the handover event.
If there is a rationale for a handover such
as “I have to go away from the ward for a
few hours and you’ll have to cover for me”.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedMeetingCUIHD
30Users are not inhibited in further patient
care even if the handover process is
incomplete.
AdoptedHandover may not happen/be incomplete or late -
users must still be able to care for the patient and
use the patient’s record even if this is the case.
(The incomplete process should be documented).
If handover cannot take place and
therefore is not documented, users are not
locked out of that patient’s record until the
handover has been accepted.
xxxxxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD
31Where a handover is unsatisfactory
(e.g. incorrect/late/incomplete), users
can record this, and the details of why it
was not satisfactory. This is possible
retrospectively, with a clear indicator
and a time/date/user stamp.
AdoptedHandover may not happen/be brief, incorrect or
late - system must not inhibit patient care if this is
the case, but must accept a retrospective note to
record why. This note could apply to the handover
episode as a whole or to a particular patient’s
handover.
xxxxxxxRecommendedMeetingCUIHD
32For handover documentation data that
is not automatically populated, users
are clear about what data should be
recorded.
AdoptedMuch of the information in the documentation used
in handover may be automatically populated from
other electronic sources e.g. EPR. However,
where this is not the case and users have to record
information themselves, they should be clear about
what information they are supposed to be
recording.


IF handover documentation is a table of
patients, the column headings
unambiguously explain what should go in
to the content of the table.
xxxxxxRecommendedMeetingCUIHD
33Users can easily and quickly make
updates to information during handover
(including tasks). These updates are
reflected in the patient’s record.
AdoptedUsers need to be able to add tasks and change
information during the handover without overly
disrupting the handover. Any changes made to the
information must be part of the ‘source’ information
and not solely made on a ‘handover copy’ of it. If it
is too arduous to add a task at handover it may
lead users to resorting to paper notes.

On-call is often the time when the most
difficult patients to handover are those that
are sick and have just arrived, and may not
be on the computer system/list. Therefore
key information may be disseminated
verbally at handover which is not currently
written. It would be useful to capture this.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedInferredV4HD
34Depending on context, users can view
documentation for handover that is
continually up to date.
AdoptedThough it will be useful if documentation used in
handover is as up to date as the situation allows, in
some contexts there will be extra importance
attached to having a ‘real-time’ view on the set of
information. A continually updated view may of
course be useful for things other than handover.
Some clinical areas require an ad-hoc handover
resource which is up-to-date all the time, current
examples include a shared whiteboard or an
annotated ward list. These form the basis of
handovers.

Ward whiteboards currently fulfil this
function in hospitals (A&E and labour
wards often have more detail). Communal
patient lists such as handover diaries may
attempt to provide a similar function.
xxxxxxxxxxxEssentialUser researchV9HD
36Users can handover items (e.g. patients
or tasks for patients) outside of a
designated ‘handover’ time. Handover
initiation and acceptance works as
usual.
AdoptedHandover will not just occur at shift handovers or
main ‘handover events’. Smaller ad-hoc handovers
such as for one task must be possible, as well as
the effective management of this handover.
For jobs that occur during a shift that a
nurse needs to let another nurse or a
doctor know that they need doing, there
needs to be a system for distributing,
tracking and completing the task.
xxxxxxxEssentialUser researchV11HD
37Users can collect, analyse and report on
the information relating to the handover
event, and the information used in the
handover. This may be used to plan and
allocate resources.


Adopted
Senior staff can tell how long the
handovers are taking, what proportion are
being carried out unsatisfactorily, how
many jobs staff are being required to do,
etc.
xxxxxRecommendedUser researchV11, L45HD
38Users can handover satisfactorily in
exceptional circumstances, such as
when no documentation has been
completed.
AdoptedAmbulance services transferring someone
acutely before documentation has been
done.
xxxxxxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD

4 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

39Users can update the information
before, during and after handover.
These updates are performed on the
patient record.
AdoptedIf a user updates information used in the handover
they update the source of the information - not just
a ‘handover copy’.
Appropriate mechanisms should be in place to
ensure that any additional information input to the
record after the handover, by the giver, is flagged
to the receiver.
For example, adding a task to the ‘master’
task list for the patient
Col6Col7xCol9xxxxCol14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20xCol22xCol24xxCol27EssentialCol29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34User researchV29Col37HD
40Users can view ‘snapshots’ of the
documentation used in handover at
certain points of handover from the
past. (Time slicing of documentation).
AdoptedCurrently some handover documentation
is in page-by-page diaries that allow the
user to look back at past handover
summaries at particular times.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopL49HD
42If ‘non-current’ (i.e. past or future) views
of information used in handover are
possible, users can clearly identify the
date and time they refer to. Particularly
important when looking at handover
’snapshots’ over time.
AdoptedRelated to RID 40.xxxxxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD
43Users do not have to view unnecessary
information at handover. Therefore the
default datasets per item should be the
minimum necessary for that context.
AdoptedThe handover summaries of patients should be
minimal, but this requirement applies to
information about other issues e.g. ward
management. Relates to RID 1.
xxxRecommendedUser researchV30HD
44Users can view all planned tasks for a
patient.
AdoptedNursing care plan. Requirement for prep
for theatres etc.
xxxxxxxxxxEssentialDocument reviewA1,23,4,5,7,9,20
,27,29,51,71
DAS
45Users can view the documentation used
in handover in single or multi-patient
views.

Adopted
Multi-patient view: Night doctor covering a
number of patients. Single patient view:
information required to hand a patient over
from one area to another, e.g. from theatre
to recovery.
xxxxxxxxEssentialDocument reviewA53DAS
46Where there is the suspicion that
information used in handover is
incorrect or there are discrepancies
between two sources of information,
users can easily identify which
information is correct or initiate
processes to identify this.
AdoptedThe preparation for handover is often a process of
working out what information is correct e.g. has the
patient had this particular task done yet? During
this, users need to be able to identify which is the
correct (e.g. most up to date) information.

The handover documentation says that the
patient has not had their medication, but
their nurse says that they have.
xxxxxxxxEssentialFocus groupsCUIHD
47All users involved in a handover can
read the documentation used in
handover simultaneously.
AdoptedThe handover information may be
communally displayed on the wall.
xxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopL49HD
48Users can view the handover
’snapshots’ from previous handover
events at either a multi-patient level, or
an individual patient level within a
patient’s record.
AdoptedViews of the handover documentation at a
handover point (handover snapshots) can be
viewed at a multi-patient level. In addition, from
within a patient’s record, users can view the
handover snapshots for that patient.
xxxxxxxxEssentialDocument reviewA51DAS
49Users can view and record patient
demographics and attributes that make
up a unique patient identifier.
(EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
AdoptedName, dob, location, contact details, next
of kin, NHS number, photo, bar coding.
xxxxxxxxxxEssentialDocument reviewAllHD
50Users can view and record a patient’s
current medical problems. (EXAMPLE
DATASET PART)
AdoptedNursing care plans, medical plans.xxxxxxxxxEssentialDocument reviewA2,9,20,27,29,5
1,71
DAS
51Users can allocate and record tasks to
particular sets of individuals (e.g. jobs
for the on-call team).
AdoptedRole based, speciality based, shift based
tasks.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationJames FoneHD
52Users can allocate and record tasks to a
particular individual (e.g. task for on call
doctor Dr X).

Adopted
This could be a specific role or a specific person.xxxxxxxxEssentialObservationJames FoneHD
53Users are alerted to overdue tasks e.g.
overdue medication administration.
AdoptedxxxxxxxxEssentialObservationJames FoneHD
54Users can highlight tasks specifically for
handover, rather than the job being
permanently highlighted.

Adopted
Users may need to draw attention to particular
tasks but not have those tasks permanently
highlighted.
We must do this job….(??)xxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationHenry DowlenHD
56Users are able to log incomplete tasks.AdoptedxxxxxxxxxEssentialObservationJames FoneHD
57Users can have allocated tasks
integrated into their diary management
systems.
AdoptedA nurse/doctor should be able to pick up
tasks from another member of staff and
have them directly transferred into their
own diary management system.
xxxxxxxxxDesirableMeetingCUIDAS
58Users can view an accurate, up to date
list of patients (or items) that they are
responsible for.
AdoptedThere may be patients who need handing over
who have left hospital/are under the care of a
different team/died/have not come in, but who do
not appear on the ward (for example) yet.
xxxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopL49HD
59Users of different roles, and individuals
within those roles can use the list of
items used in handover as personal ‘tick-
lists’.

Adopted
Once a list of patients has been created, different
users may want to use that list to check-mark
whether they have completed an action in relation
to each of the patients in that list. This may be
actions that are in addition to the formal task
management.
A pharmacist can tick off patients they
have reviewed on the ward, SHOs can tick
off patients that have been seen on the
ward round, physician assistants can tick
off the patients whose records they have
checked for blood test requests.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopL49HD
60Users can view an item’s status with
regard to a context-specific checklist
reflecting agreed guidelines and
procedures (e.g. a patient on a care
pathway). This includes functionality
around these checklists such as
recording additional information and
highlighting exceptions.
AdoptedContext-specific checklists reflecting agreed
guidelines and procedures.
The position of a patient on a care
pathway for day surgery; what checks
have been done on the patient, what
checks are still to be done, are there any
exceptions from the expected pathway,
etc.
xxxxxxxxxxRecommendedMeetingCUICUIHD

5 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

62Users are encouraged to use written
documentation as well as the verbal
channel during handover.
AdoptedCurrently many handovers are purely verbal.
Though verbal handover is useful, supplementing
with written documentation (even just that the
handover has taken place) is a good idea.
There is a list of patients to be handed
over that is communally discussed at the
handover.
Col6Col7xCol9xxxxCol14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20xxCol23Col24xxCol27RecommendedCol29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34User researchLASCol37HD
63User can view all the items they are
responsible for as a ‘single’ list.
AdoptedRelates to RID 8.xxxxxxxRecommendedObservationJames FoneHD
64Users are clear, at all times, who has
responsibility for an item (such as a
patient).
AdoptedGeneric version of RID 12.xxxxxxxxxEssentialUser researchLASHD
65Users can take account of contextually
relevant handover information
structures when verbal and written
information is handed over.
AdoptedSome contexts use predefined structures to aid the
collation of handover information, the handing over
of information and set the expectations of those
users being handed over to. The communication of
these structures may be made explicit in the
written handover information.
Current usage of structure for handover
information: MIST for paramedics - (made
explicit in handover interface), WEST
acronym in air traffic control shift
handover, ‘system’ headings in some
nursing shift summary documentation (e.g.
breathing, mobility, etc).
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchLASHD
66Users are able to prepare a summary of
information to be handed over, if
necessary, even if such a summary
already exists e.g. if automatically
generated.

Adopted
Preparing a written summary of handover
information prior to handover even if one is
automatically generated is a loose interpretation of
a handover strategy identified by Patterson et al.
The idea is that automatically generated
summaries do not require users to really think
about the handover data. See RID 79.
Prior to handover users giving handover
write a short summary of the important
issues (with the item’s) they are going to
handover.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchLASHD
67Users are encouraged to question the
user handing over.
AdoptedInteractive questioning is a handover strategy
identified by Patterson et al. With comprehensive,
automatically generated handover documentation
there is a danger that neither side of the handover
seeks to question the data or delve deeper beyond
what is presented.
User handing over says that the patient
has been vomiting quite a lot, the users
being handed over to ask whether this is
just after eating food or continually.
xxxxxxRecommendedUser researchNATSHD
68Users can easily identify data missing
from the expected handover dataset for
that context. Especially relevant to users
receiving handover.

Adopted
The patient’s name, date of birth and
number are missing from a ‘John Doe’
patient still to be identified after a major
trauma incident.
xxxxxxxxxEssentialUser researchNATSHD
69Users can temporarily alter the
’richness’ of the data display in order to
bring clarity to salient details.
AdoptedWhere there is a handover such as in ITU
with a lot of information being transferred,
it may be useful to increase or decrease
the level of detail of that handover, e.g.
fading in/out of observations next to
summaries.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchNATSHD
70Users can initiate or delay the handover
if necessary. This is especially relevant
for non-scheduled handovers.
AdoptedIn paramedic handover to A&E the user
handing over makes a request for
handover, this can be delayed by the user
they are trying to handover to.
xxxxxxEssentialUser researchNATSHD
71Users are encouraged to handover
items (e.g. patients) in order of priority.
AdoptedRelates to RID 23 & 106. Contradicts RID 127.xxxxxRecommendedUser researchNATSHD
72Users can handover according to
information governance and privacy
considerations. That is to say, is it not
easy for other patients to see/overhear
handovers about other patients.
AdoptedHandovers will usually contain private information
and information which other patients should not
see or hear. Currently handover often has to be
conducted in communal areas due to space
limitation or the fixed location of artefacts used in
handover e.g. a whiteboard. Future handover
should try to minimise the necessity to handover in
places where other patients might overhear.
Communal artefacts such as detailed
labour ward whiteboards are useful for
handover (so should be in private), but
also useful to be able to access very easily
(so should be in public areas). Linked
electronic large-scale displays could allow
handover information to be in a private
room, and ward information to be on public
view.

xxxxxxEssentialUser researchLASHD
73Users can review the documentation to
be used in handover, prior to the
handover taking place.
AdoptedIt is good practice that users receiving handover
make themselves aware of the situation before the
handover takes place. Therefore the
documentation to be used in handover should be
available for them to review before the handover.
This documentation may include the equivalent of
’activity logs’.
While waiting for the shift handover to take
place, the nurse can read the observation
charts to get an overall picture of how the
patient has been doing. Once the
handover takes place they can ask
questions about the information they have
seen.
xxxxxRecommendedUser researchL15HD
75Users can unambiguously interpret the
status of a task (e.g. completed,
partially completed, incomplete, etc).
This status may have further values that
are yet to be defined
AdoptedDefining an unambiguous status may be very
difficult in practice, (e.g. should completed tasks
be shown? If so which ones?), but is crucial to
good clinical management. Some tasks may have
several important more detailed states which may
be necessary to reflect e.g., bloods taken, sent,
processing, finished but not checked, checked,
checked and acted on, checked and ‘signed’, etc.
xxxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopL49HD
76Users see information displayed using
symbols and abbreviations that they can
clearly understand. This implies those in
standard use in the NHS.


Adopted
Symbols and abbreviations must be clearly
understood by all users. Symbols and
abbreviations may not be NHS data standards but
they should conform to those in use in the NHS.
Mg, Mcg, 3/7, TTO, (?)xxxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopL45HD
77Users in certain contexts can use
supplementary patient identifiers in
addition to the standard NHS set.
AdoptedNot all contexts that clinical handover occurs in
may be able to uniquely identify a patient with
standard NHS identifiers alone. Supplementary
identifiers should be used as appropriate.
Social security number for handover
involving social services.
xxxxxxxxxEssentialMeetingCUIHD
78All users are encouraged to take
ownership of the information in the
shared documentation used in
handover.
AdoptedWhere documentation used in handover is used
communally e.g. patient records, this should mean
that everyone takes responsibility for it’s accuracy
and for being up to date, rather than nobody. How
this might be achieved is unclear.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchNATSHD
79Users do not have to duplicate existing
information unnecessarily in order to
prepare for handover. That is to say,
information duplication should be
minimised.
AdoptedWhen preparing for handover, the duplication of
existing data should be minimised for users.
Where possible, information is ‘automatically
populated’ in documentation used in handover.
Data duplication MAY be necessary if deemed an
appropriate handover strategy (see RID 66).
xxxxxEssentialWorkshopHD

6 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

80All users can update the documentation
used in handover simultaneously
before, during and after handover. This
does not extend to being able to update
the same bit of data simultaneously.
The clinical application conventions for
update management should be
followed.
AdoptedRelated to RID 9, 33, 39.The outgoing users may have forgotten to
add something and the incoming may want
to make notes on the same patient during
handover. Currently some wards may
have handover documents as shared files
on a network, this means that only one
person can update the document (for all
patients on the ward) at a time.
Col6Col7xCol9xxxxCol14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20xCol22xCol24xxCol27EssentialCol29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34WorkshopCol36Col37HD
81Users are encouraged to use
standardised handover processes and
information (relevant to their context).
AdoptedAlthough it is inevitable that people will adapt the
system to their own needs, and furthermore NEED
to be able to do this, there should be some attempt
and standardisation through good practice across
the health sector.
Paramedic handover standards.xxxxxxEssentialWorkshopHD
82Users can easily determine which items
have been handed over and which are
left to handover.
AdoptedA ‘handed over’ status icon. Items can be
physically referenced such as the paper
strips used in Air Traffic Control.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopHD
83Users can view and record tasks that
are not associated with a patient.
AdoptedNot all tasks will be to do with patients.Nursing job to check the resus trolley on
the ward.
xxxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopHD
84Users can view and record handover
information for items that do not
conform to the standard physical
locations dealt with. For example,
patients who are in a corridor instead of
in a ward bed, patients on the way to
A&E, outpatients.
AdoptedOccasionally, items (e.g. patients) will not conform
to the standard location categories. If this happens
the users should still be able to view and record
the normal information about the items using the
documentation used in handover. This might
include items without a fixed location or items that
have not yet arrived at the site of care.
In an emergency all of the usual bed
locations are full and patients have to be
kept in beds in the corridor.
xxxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopHD
85Users can highlight and prioritise
patients and non-patient tasks. Tasks
can be highlighted and prioritised
WITHIN a patient’s dataset.
AdoptedPatients may need to be highlighted in order to
indicate priority. Non-patient tasks are OK to be
prioritised. Patent-related task prioritisation could
be dangerous, therefore the patients need to be
prioritised first, followed by prioritisation of task for
each patient.
Patients requiring review, urgent
investigations, urgent results awaited,
review before discharge.
xxxxxxxxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopHD
86Users are encouraged to have a
synchronous handover.
AdoptedWith accurate, easily accessible, up to date
documentation, users might be discouraged from
having synchronous handovers. However, they
should be encouraged to have synchronous
handovers.
Handover protocols seem a likely way to
encourage synchronous handover.
Monitoring of the handover ‘handshake’
could be a way to check whether this was
happening.
xxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopHD
87Users giving or receiving handover can
refuse to transfer / accept transfer of
responsibility. This is recorded in the
same way as the handover event &
‘handshake’
AdoptedA user giving handover can refuse to transfer
responsibility to another user, and a user receiving
handover can refuse to accept responsibility. This
must be documented, though a handover has not
taken place.
A ward nurse refuses to accept a patient
from recovery due to continued bleeding.
xxxxxEssentialWorkshopHD
88Users can make personal notes during
the handover. These notes are recorded
by the system, but not necessarily part
of any patient’s record. (Governance)

Adopted
Some users currently take notes during handover
in order to help them manage/remember
tasks/information. The act of taking notes may help
users remember them, rather than using the notes
as a memory aid. Taking personal notes is not
intended to be a facility for staff to record
xxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopHD
89Users can identify the clinician ‘currently
responsible for’ a patient as well as the
consultant who has overall
responsibility for them. (EXAMPLE
DATASET PART)
AdoptedIn hospital, patients are usually marked as under
the responsibility of a particular consultant.
However, other members of staff may want to
contact the member of staff who is actually looking
after that patient at a particular time such as the on-
call doctor.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopHD
90Users can filter tasks to show those
allocated for a particular: role
/speciality/individual staff member /set
of staff.
AdoptedAssumptions that ‘by default’ tasks are
multidisciplinary, but can be filtered on various
parameters. Users in specific roles can see which
tasks apply to their role only but also to others’
roles/individuals/groups. See also RID 126 and 14.
Role based, speciality based, shift based
tasks.
xxxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopHD
91Users can view patient observations
that have been electronically captured
and automatically populated in the
system. Automatic alerts can be
associated with parameters.
AdoptedIncreasingly, patient observations are being
captured electronically and can be fed into patient
records and monitored remotely. Documentation
used in handover may utilise these is some
situations.
There is an existing handover system that
has an alert flag associated with
automatically captured parameters as part
of the handover dataset.
xxxxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationHenry DowlenVitalPACHD
92Users can view documentation used for
handover containing trends of
observations.
AdoptedImportant in settings such as Theatre, ITU, HDU.ITU chart used in one-to-one nursing
handover.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationJames FoneHD
93Users can include audio or video
information as part of the
documentation used in handover.
AdoptedIn some contexts asynchronous handover (or
partly asynchronous handover) is carried out using
audio recording. This has some disadvantages, but
may be useful in some circumstances. Audio and
video documentation may also be an important
part of the ‘normal’ patient record, e.g. a video of
surgery.

Nurses in intensive care can record short
audio summaries for patient handover in
situations where there is not time to have a
full written documentation-supported
handover.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationHenry DowlenHD
94Users can use machine-readable
identification to support patient
identification.
AdoptedBar coding, RFID tags.xxxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationHenry DowlenHD
96Users can print out aspects of the
documentation used in handover, such
as lists of patients to be handed over.
These printouts will be subject to
information governance rules. Care
must be taken that printouts do not
discourage users from using the
electronic documentation.
AdoptedCurrently handover documentation is on paper,
often printed patient lists. This is because of their
mobility and ease of updating. However, paper
lists have considerable disadvantages and
therefore great care must be taken with their use -
users must not be discouraged from viewing or
updating the electronic documentation. In addition,
there should be strict information governance rules
about the use of the printouts e.g. that leaving
them lying around is a disciplinary offence.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationHenry DowlenHD
97Users can view the information used in
handover in a time-based format (e.g.
diary format).
AdoptedTo allow work planning for a shift or community
work
Some wards have day-by-day diaries to
record patients and jobs.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationHenry DowlenHD
98Users can record and view tasks that
are interdependent.
AdoptedCheck bloods before increasing
medication dose.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL8HD

7 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

99Users have minimal interruption while
handover is going on.
AdoptedCol4An ‘intelligent’ messaging system could
defer all non-urgent messages sent to the
users involved in handover until after the
handover has finished.
Col6Col7xCol9Col10xxCol13Col14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20xCol22Col23Col24xxCol27RecommendedCol29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34User researchL15Col37HD
100Users can easily refer to information
about previous handover events and
information used in previous handovers.
AdoptedUsers may want to be able to find out ‘old’
information about an item such as “what happened
with this patient yesterday?” or “have they had any
bloods done?”. This may include information about
the handover itself e.g. was it completed
successfully.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL15HD
101Users are encouraged to establish a
leader for the handover.
AdoptedIt is not clear from the handover literature whether
there should be one leader for the handover, or a
leader for the receiving and a leader for the giving
of handover. A single leader is likely to be the
more practical.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL15HD
102Users can view historical values for
information during handover.
AdoptedThough the handover documentation will focus on
the ‘current’ values for information (e.g. what ward
is this patient on), it will be useful to discover
previous values for the same data item (e.g. what
ward were they on last week).
If a patient’s test values are of interest
during a handover, users can access
previous test values as opposed to just the
most recent ones.
xxxxxxxxxEssentialUser researchHenry DowlenHD
103Users are not be unduly constrained to
have a handover in a fixed place, time
and duration. However, they may be
encouraged to do so.
AdoptedIt is good practice to have handovers at a fixed
place, fixed time and for a roughly pre-determined
duration. However it may be necessary to alter
these according to circumstances. Users should
still be able to handover as usual in these differing
circumstances.
Due to an electrical fault, handover has to
be moved to another room. Users involved
can be notified ahead of time and can use
another large screen Display to display the
documentation used in handover.
xxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL25HD
104Users must ‘manually remove’ tasks
and items from being current in the
system. For example, completed tasks
are not automatically archived or
removed once their due date has past.
User intervention is required to remove
and sign off tasks.
AdoptedIf the documentation used in handover represents
a view of information that is broadly ‘current’ then
’old’ information must somehow be removed from
the current view (into some representation of the
past). To ensure that users have acknowledged
tasks and items these must be ‘manually removed’
from the current view, rather than automatically
removed. Relates to RID 122.
xxxxxxxxxxxRecommendedObservationJames FoneHD
105Users are prevented from accidentally
updating the information used in
handover.
AdoptedGeneric application requirement.xxxxxEssentialObservationJames FoneHD
106Users can view items to handover -
displayed in an appropriate order by
default for their context (e.g. bed no,
priority, time to be seen etc).
AdoptedRelates to RID 23 & 106. Contradicts RID 127.Ward patient lists are usually ordered by
bed number.
xxxxxxxRecommendedObservationJames FoneHD
107For certain handover contexts, users
are discouraged from initiating certain
kinds of actions during the handover as
they may distract the users from
handover itself.
AdoptedDuring handover, users should be focused on the
handover. With the possibility of being able to
initiate actions at any time (e.g. computerised
order entry), users may be tempted to carry out
actions while the handover is ongoing. In some
circumstances users should be encouraged to
focus on the handover as opposed to immediately
carrying out the actions identified in handover.
Carrying out these actions MAY distract the users
from handover and MAY increase the length of
handover.
If users in handover try to order tests
electronically during shift handover they
receive a warning message reminding
them that they should defer this action until
after handover. This warning message is
communally displayed so that all users in
handover can see that the user is
potentially not giving their full attention to
the handover. During some types of
handover it may be advantageous to order
tests such as during a handover on a post-
take ward round.
xxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL15HD
108For certain handover contexts, users
are encouraged to ‘read back’ key
information to ensure correctness.
AdoptedFor critical information, ‘read back’ helps ensure
correctness. Certain handover contexts will require
an extra degree of certainty in information handed
over.
Where handover is not face-to-face and
two patients have very similar names on
the same ward, and one patient is not for
resuscitation, the user receiving handover
should read back the name and DNR
status of that patient. This could be
encouraged via a reminder prompt.
xxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL15HD
109Users are encouraged to clarify
ambiguous information used in
handover.
AdoptedUsers RECEIVING handover in particular should
be encouraged to clarify ambiguous information
with the user handing over.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedWorkshopHD
110Users can access documentation to be
used in handover that is a single reliable
source.

Adopted
Currently handover is often done using multiple
paper sources of information, therefore it is often
laborious or hard to determine what is the most up
to date information.
xxxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopHD
111Users can access the documentation
used in handover at all times and places
during their work.

Adopted
xxxxxxxxEssentialWorkshopHD
112Users can update the documentation
used in handover for items they are
responsible for, e.g. nurses looking after
patients update the documentation for
those patients.

Adopted
The users who are responsible for particular items
update those items in the documentation
themselves; rather than the documentation to be
used in handover being updated by a third party
e.g. a ward manager, or a ‘documentation
administrator’.
xxxxxxRecommendedObservationJames FoneHD
114Users have access and update control
restricted according to their profile.
AdoptedxxxxxxxxxEssentialObservationHenry DowlenHD
115Users can have ad-hoc handovers
(where appropriate). Ad-hoc handovers
may have extra requirements to
scheduled handovers.
AdoptedSome contexts have many ad-hoc handovers more
often than scheduled handovers. The mechanism
for initiation (and awareness of) ad-hoc handover
has greater importance than for scheduled
handover.

Paramedic handover to A&E staff is ad-
hoc. Paramedics need to alert A&E staff
that they need to handover a patient.
xxxxxEssentialUser researchNATSHD
116Users in handover can view the same
handover documentation whether they
are co-located or not.
AdoptedHandover in some contexts may have to occur
over the phone. The same documentation used in
handover needs to be available to both users.
xxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchL5HD
117Users can view information displayed in
a consistent way (e.g. order) per type of
item (e.g. a patient). This may vary per
type of item and on handover context.
AdoptedIn the list of summaries for handover, each
patient has their data fields displayed in
the same order e.g. name, DOB, health
issue, tasks, etc.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchJfoneHD

8 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

118Users can ‘externally’ monitor the
documentation of the handover event.
Users who were not present at the
handover can understand what took
place (users may not be physically
located at the place the handover is
taking place, or they could miss it
altogether).
AdoptedSome users such as senior staff on call may want
to monitor the status of their team and the status of
the items under the responsibility of their team.
This can be done by being able to monitor both the
documentation used in handover and the
documentation of the handover event (including
’handshake’). Relates to RID 18.
A consultant on call can access the
handover summary via the internet.
Col6Col7xCol9xxxxCol14Col15Col16xCol18Col19Col20xCol22Col23Col24xxCol27EssentialCol29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34User researchLASCol37HD
119Users have an indication of items that
have recently left the area of
responsibility (e.g. patients who have
been discharged), and access to
information about them.
AdoptedxxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchNATSHD
120Users can mark a patient for discharge
without that patient actually being
’discharged’ on the system.
AdoptedPart of a patient’s plan may be whether they are
going to be discharged from a care setting in the
near future. Currently, paper patient lists used in
handover are used to mark which patients may be
discharged.
xxxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchA62HD
121Users can view the empty beds within a
set of beds e.g. a ward (where
appropriate).
AdoptedEmpty beds per ward is featured on an
existing handover system. It is also an
implicit feature of paper patient lists and
ward whiteboards.
xxxxxxxxRecommendedUser researchJfoneHD
122Users can view the summary
information used in handover as a
’clean’ set of data that allows them to
clearly identify the most current
information. This is not necessarily the
default view of the information.
AdoptedIt is likely that for handover, users will need to see
’old’ information as well as the most current. For
example it is important to be able to see what
tasks have been done as well as those still to do.
However, this ‘old’ information may clutter the
documentation so, for clarity possible solutions
are: 1) It may be temporarily hidden, 2) Completed
information is removed to an easily accessible
place in the documentation, leaving the most
current information. Relates to RID 104.

If completed tasks remain on a patient’s
’current’ task list (either for a preset period
of time or until they are manually
removed), the completed tasks can be
’hidden’ temporarily.
xxxxxxxxxEssentialUser researchJames FoneHD
123Users can add tasks with a time
dependency e.g. tomorrow, next week,
after the operation.
AdoptedUsers need to be able to see whether tasks are
supposed to be done ASAP or at a later time.
Patient needs another scan in 5 days time.xxxxxx
124Users can add (and manage) tasks for
items that are not currently in the
location dealt with in the handover.
AdoptedPatient who is coming in next week will
need a blood test before their operation.
xxxxxxx
125Users can reallocate sets of tasks to
different users. This should be reflected
in the respective task/diary
management systems.
AdoptedA nurse picks up the tasks from a member
for staff who has had to go home unwell,
these are transferred into their own diary.
xxx
126Users view all an item’s tasks by default
(e.g. at a multidisciplinary level).
AdoptedRelated to RID 90.xxxxxx
127Users are encouraged to handover
items in a consistent order irrespective
of the situation (e.g. bed order).
AdoptedContradicts RID 71. Related to RID 106 and 23.Ward patients are usually handed over in
bed number order.
xxxxx
128Users can view the handover summary
and the ‘full’ information per item
unfiltered, that is, not filtered to a
particular user’s role-based view.
AdoptedAssumption is that users will view the information
used in handover (whether a summary or full
information) from a particular perspective e.g. a
nursing view. However it must be possible to be
able to see an unfiltered view, that is, everything.
Related to the requirement to be able to do this for
tasks. As to which should be the default view - it
has not been defined.
xxxxxxx
129Users can view and record information
outside of a pre-determined dataset (if a
dataset applies to their handover
information).

Adopted
May be free text, or options to add new
items to the dataset ‘ad hoc’.
xxxxxx
130Users can filter the list of items (e.g.
patients) displayed so as to show only
’problem’ items.
AdoptedThough by default a user may see all of the items
that they are responsible for, for the sake of clarity
it may be necessary to view only those items that
are problematic or need attending to e.g. unstable
patients.
A doctor working in hospital over the
weekend can filter a list of 400 patients
that they are responsible for over the
whole hospital, to a list of 20 who are
unstable and require regular review.
xxxxxx
131Users can handover using datasets
defined by their lead clinician (or
equivalent).
Adoptedxxxxxx
132Senior users (e.g. ward managers,
consultants) can check whether tasks
relating to a set of patients or a set of
staff have been completed. For
example, they can see if any medication
administrations are outstanding on a
ward.

Adopted
xxxxxx
133Users can view and record information
about patients that are not yet formally
’on the system’ since they have only just
become relevant.
AdoptedA patient is coming in by ambulance but
no details are known about them apart
from their injury. So they are: 1) Not in the
area of responsibility yet 2) Cannot be
uniquely identified on the system.
xxxxxx
134Users are encouraged to check
information for any ‘automatic’
information population of the
documentation used in handover to
avoid data duplication.
Adoptedxxxxxxxx
135Users can have information used in
handover forwarded to them.
AdoptediBleep system.xxxxxx

9 of 24 Microsoft and NHS Connecting for Health Confidential NHS CUI Design Guide R4 Handover Requirements Spreadsheet.xls

136Users can clearly differentiate and filter
to patients admitted during the previous
shift. (Or some other pre-defined time
period).
AdoptedCol4Col5xCol7Col8Col9xxxxCol14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19xCol21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26Col27Col28Col29Col30Col31Col32Col33Col34Col35Col36Col37Col38
137Users can view and record a patient’s
resuscitation status. (EXAMPLE
DATASET PART)
Adoptedxxxxxxx
138Users can clearly understand the goals
for patients. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
Adoptedxxxxxxx
139Users can flag unsatisfactory handovers
as incidents. These are dealt with
appropriately.

Adopted
xxx
140Users can view and record status for
non-patient items such as messages.
AdoptedItems such as “can someone clean the fish
tank” and “beware the fish tank is leaking
badly” may need to have status e.g.
‘acknowledged’ / ‘completed’.
xxxxxxx
141Users can view provenance for
information such as when it was last
updated.
Adoptedxxxxxxx
142Users can access basic management
and
organisational information on hospital
procedures, line management, access
to services, consultant on call, etc.
Adoptedxxxxxx
143Users can access local clinical
processes, procedures and protocols
Adoptedxxxxxx
144Users can clearly see the inclusion
criteria for the list of items in the
documentation used in handover. For
example: all surgical patients, all
paediatric patients, all ITU patients.
Adoptedxxxxxx
145Users can view a series of handover
’snapshots’ for an individual patient
within their record, so that the handover
sequence can be reviewed and audited
in relation to the management of the
individual patient.
Adoptedxxxxxxx
146Users can view generic clinical
information related to local procedures,
protocols and guidelines.
AdoptedNeeds to have good generic information such as a
broad context for the patient group, e.g. all
surgical patients in hospital.
Access to local protocols and procedures,
emergency procedures, e.g. what to do in case of
fire, violence, etc.
xxxxxxxMeetingAudience reviewIL
147Users can view management
information such as name of their line
manager or consultant in charge.
AdoptedxxxxMeetingAudience reviewIL
148Users should be able to use historical
data in resource and human
management systems and for
commissioning purposes.
AdoptedxxxMeetingAudience reviewIL
RIDAssumptions / RequirementsPlain Englisher ent tnt/Di
oal e q v q Handover Item eataset ponent
R e over anagem
d Rc Practice ne
Example m a C Hl r ei aynn nti nnrr o:: c d n e per kD Com Lists gege m e m cation
Source Source Conflicts Conditio Adoption Documen Referenc Entered a p eee a s e qnn n k cee a i srr f/ii g icc e D c i Before fcaea tcngn er edod t pi oo Hta vv aat ee i Dataset Exam Ha ar nt dspl he a Task M Tim e Item Good Ucn poc duo ar t u i ar nga da eti ne tif n it
with … nal on … Date Source t/Event e By T S RGG M AAHNH P sE IP
Col5Col6Col7Col8Col9Col10Col11Col12Col13Col14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20Col21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26Col27Col28Col29Col30
DATASETS PER ITEMDATASETS PER ITEM
1Users can view a ‘per patient’ summary of
information held in the patient’s record. This
summary is appropriate for the purpose of
handover.
Patients have a summary dataset that is
appropriate for the purpose of handover. This can
be viewed by users. That is to say, handover
requires something extra than just easy access to
the ‘full’ patient record.
See Example Handover Datasets in the
supporting document_NHS CUI Design Guide_
Handover Requirements Supporting Document.
xxxxxWorkshop
L45, V1, V4L45, V1, V4HD
2Users can view different ‘per item’ handover
information summaries according to the user’s
context.
The summary dataset per item (e.g. a patient)
appropriate for handover will vary according to
context e.g. role, care setting, purpose of
handover, user grade, speciality, etc. Users in
each different context see the dataset appropriate
to them. Note: This does NOT involve defining
what SET of items is available i.e. the inclusion
criteria for the patient list. The datasets will not be
defined in these requirements.
See the variation in the Example Handover
Datasets, e.g. MIST acronym from paramedic
handover, WEST acronym from Air Traffic
Control.
xxxxxxRID 4User researchL45, V1, V4L45, V1, V4HD
3From each item’s summary, users can easily
access more information about each item e.g.
the ‘full’ patient record.
If a user is viewing the summary for a handover
item (e.g. patient), then they can quickly and easily
get to more information about that item e.g. link to
the ‘full’ patient record available in that context.
A link to the ‘full’ patient record.xxxxxxUser researchL45, V1, V4L45, V1, V4HD
11Users can clearly and uniquely identify patients
using standard NHS patient identifiers.
(EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
There needs to be clear identification of which
patient is being handed-over in both the
documentation used in handover and any verbal
handover. NHS standards on patient identification
should be followed here.
Possible set: (full name, dob, NHS number,
location)
xxxxxxxxxMeetingV1HD
12Users are clear about who has responsibility
for the items involved in handover, during and
after the handover, especially at the point that
responsibility is transferred. An item cannot be
’no-ones’ responsibility.
User’s care is clear about who is responsible for
the items being handed over (e.g. patient’s) at all
stages. Relates to generic requirement 64.
xxxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
14Users can view the documentation used in
handover from the point of view of other users,
e.g. nurses can see a doctor’s view of the
handover information.
When there is handover between two roles,
agendas and views about the patient may differ, in
some cases considerably. Both users will need to
be aware of the other’s perspective. Related to
RID 90. Doctors and nurses often look at, and use
each other’s handover documents to help them
structure their work and communicate.
Handover between two roles. A junior doctor
being able to apply their consultant’s summary
view on the same set of in-patients during a
hospital stay, in order to assess whether they
have done the necessary tasks.
xxxxxxxxUser researchV2, L45HD
24Users can categorise patients into groups
based on different variables e.g. location,
team, severity.
This does not necessarily mean ‘grouping by’; the
groups could be separate lists and so on.
Various scales (e.g. MEWS, Waterlow),
responsibilities, geography, resuscitation status,
awaiting results, due for admission, due for
discharge, others’ responsibility and so on.
xxxxxxxInferredV4HD
25Users can view and record the item’s current
location. (EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
Which ward and bed a patient is in.xxxxxxxUser researchV4, L45HD
28Users can record information that is uniquely
part of the handover process. This is distinct
from the information that is being handed over.
Users may need to record information about the
reason for the handover, as well as the information
that they are handing over. This information will be
unique to the handover event.
If there is a rationale for a handover such as
”please clean fridge” or “please check bloods
for patient x”.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
32For handover documentation data that is not
automatically populated, users are clear about
what data should be recorded.
Much of the information in the documentation used
in handover may be automatically populated from
other electronic sources e.g. EPR. However,
where this is not the case and users have to
record information themselves, they should be
clear about what information they are supposed to
be recording.
IF handover documentation is a table of
patients, the column headings unambiguously
explain what should go in to the content of the
table.
xxxxMeetingCUIHD
33Users can easily and quickly make updates to
information during handover (including tasks).
These updates are reflected in the patient’s
record.
Users need to be able to add tasks and change
information during the handover without overly
disrupting the handover. Any changes made to the
information must be part of the ‘source’ information
and not solely made on a ‘handover copy’ of it. If it
is too arduous to add a task at handover it may
lead users to resorting to paper notes.

On-call is often the time when the most difficult
patients to handover are those that are sick and
have just arrived, and may not be on the
computer system/list. Therefore key information
may be disseminated verbally at handover
which is not currently written. It would be useful
to capture this.
xxxxxxxInferredV4HD
34Depending on context, users can view
documentation for handover that is continually
up to date.
Though it will be useful if documentation used in
handover is as up to date as the situation allows,
in some contexts there will be extra importance
attached to having a ‘real-time’ view on the set of
information. A continually updated view may of
course be useful for things other than handover.
Some clinical areas require an ad-hoc handover
resource which is up-to-date all the time, current
examples include a shared whiteboard or an
annotated ward list. These form the basis of
handovers.
Ward whiteboards currently fulfil this function in
hospitals (A&E and labour wards often have
more detail). Communal patient lists such as
handover diaries may attempt to provide a
similar function.
xxxxxxxxxUser researchV9HD
43Users do not have to view unnecessary
information at handover. Therefore the default
datasets per item should be the minimum
necessary for that context.
The handover summaries of patients should be
minimal, but this requirement applies to
information about other issues e.g. ward
management. Relates to RID 1.
Col4Col5Col6xCol8Col9xCol11Col12Col13xCol15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20Col21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26User researchV30Col29HD
44Users can view all planned tasks for a patient.Nursing care plan. Requirement for prep for
theatres etc.
xxxxxxxxDocument reviewA1,23,4,5,
7,9,20,27,
29,51,71
DAS
49Users can view and record patient
demographics and attributes that make up a
unique patient identifier. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
Name, dob, location, contact details, next of kin,
NHS number, photo, bar coding.

x
xxxxxxxDocument reviewAllHD
50Users can view and record a patient’s current
medical problems. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
Nursing care plans, medical plans.xxxxxxxDocument reviewA2,9,20,2
7,29,51,7
1
DAS
59Users of different roles, and individuals within
those roles can use the list of items used in
handover as personal ‘tick-lists’.
Once a list of patients has been created, different
users may want to use that list to check-mark
whether they have completed an action in relation
to each of the patients in that list. This may be
actions that are in addition to the formal task
management.
A pharmacist can tick off patients they have
reviewed on the ward, SHOs can tick off
patients that have been seen on the ward
round, physician assistants can tick off the
patients whose records they have checked for
blood test requests.
xxxxxxxWorkshopL49HD
60Users can view an item’s status with regard to
a context-specific checklist reflecting agreed
guidelines and procedures (e.g. a patient on a
care pathway). This includes functionality
around these checklists such as recording
additional information and highlighting
exceptions.
Context-specific checklists reflecting agreed
guidelines and procedures.
The position of a patient on a care pathway for
day surgery; what checks have been done on
the patient, what checks are still to be done, are
there any exceptions from the expected
pathway, etc.
xxxxxxxxMeetingCUICUIHD
65Users can take account of contextually relevant
handover information structures when verbal
and written information is handed over.

Some contexts use predefined structures to aid
the collation of handover information, the handing
over of information and set the expectations of
those users being handed over to. The
communication of these structures may be made
explicit in the written handover information.
Current usage of structure for handover
information: MIST for paramedics - (made
explicit in handover interface), WEST acronym
in air traffic control shift handover, ‘system’
headings in some nursing shift summary
documentation (e.g. breathing, mobility, etc).
xxxxxxxUser researchLASHD
66Users are able to prepare a summary of
information to be handed over, if necessary,
even if such a summary already exists e.g. if
automatically generated.
Preparing a written summary of handover
information prior to handover even if one is
automatically generated is a loose interpretation of
a handover strategy identified by Patterson et al.
The idea is that automatically generated
summaries do not require users to really think
about the handover data. See RID 79.
Prior to handover users giving handover write a
short summary of the important issues (with the
item’s) they are going to handover.
xxxxxxUser researchLASHD
68Users can easily identify data missing from the
expected handover dataset for that context.
Especially relevant to users receiving
handover.
The patient’s name, date of birth and number
are missing from a ‘John Doe’ patient still to be
identified after a major trauma incident.
xxxxxxxUser researchNATSHD
69Users can temporarily alter the ‘richness’ of the
data display in order to bring clarity to salient
details.
Where there is a handover such as in ITU with
a lot of information being transferred, it may be
useful to increase or decrease the level of detail
of that handover, e.g. fading in/out of
observations next to summaries.
xxxxxxxUser researchNATSHD
72Users can handover according to information
governance and privacy considerations. That is
to say, is it not easy for other patients to
see/overhear handovers about other patients.

Handovers will usually contain private information
and information which other patients should not
see or hear. Currently handover often has to be
conducted in communal areas due to space
limitation or the fixed location of artefacts used in
handover e.g. a whiteboard. Future handover
should try to minimise the necessity to handover in
places where other patients might overhear.
Communal artefacts such as detailed labour
ward whiteboards are useful for handover (so
should be in private), but also useful to be able
to access very easily (so should be in public
areas). Linked electronic large-scale displays
could allow handover information to be in a
private room, and ward information to be on
public view.
xxxxUser researchLASHD
77Users in certain contexts can use
supplementary patient identifiers in addition to
the standard NHS set.
Not all contexts that clinical handover occurs in
may be able to uniquely identify a patient with
standard NHS identifiers alone. Supplementary
identifiers should be used as appropriate.
Social security number for handover involving
social services.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
81Users are encouraged to use standardised
handover processes and information (relevant
to their context).
Although it is inevitable that people will adapt the
system to their own needs, and furthermore NEED
to be able to do this, there should be some
attempt and standardisation through good practice
across the health sector.
Paramedic handover standards.xxxxWorkshopHD
82Users can easily determine which items have
been handed over and which are left to
handover.
A ‘handed over’ status icon. Items can be
physically referenced such as the paper strips
used in Air Traffic Control.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
85Users can highlight and prioritise patients and
non-patient tasks. Tasks can be highlighted
and prioritised WITHIN a patient’s dataset.
Patients may need to be highlighted in order to
indicate priority. Non-patient tasks are OK to be
prioritised. Patent-related task prioritisation could
be dangerous, therefore the patients need to be
prioritised first, followed by prioritisation of task for
each patient.
Patients requiring review, urgent investigations,
urgent results awaited, review before discharge.
xxxxxxxxxxWorkshopHD
88Users can make personal notes during the
handover. These notes are recorded by the
system, but not necessarily part of any
patient’s record. (Governance)
Some users currently take notes during handover
in order to help them manage/remember
tasks/information. The act of taking notes may
help users remember them, rather than using the
notes as a memory aid. Taking personal notes is
not intended to be a facility for staff to record
information that they want to transfer informally
(e.g. ‘this patient is a nightmare’). Because
personal notes might be used in this way, this
requirement may need to be reconsidered.
Col4Col5Col6xCol8Col9xCol11Col12Col13xCol15Col16Col17Col18Col19xCol21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26WorkshopCol28Col29HD
89Users can identify the clinician ‘currently
responsible for’ a patient as well as the
consultant who has overall responsibility for
them. (EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
In hospital, patients are usually marked as under
the responsibility of a particular consultant.
However, other members of staff may want to
contact the member of staff who is actually looking
after that patient at a particular time such as the
on-call doctor.
xxxxxxxWorkshopHD
91Users can view patient observations that have
been electronically captured and automatically
populated in the system. Automatic alerts can
be associated with parameters.
Increasingly, patient observations are being
captured electronically and can be fed into patient
records and monitored remotely. Documentation
used in handover may utilise these is some
situations.
There is an existing handover system that has
an alert flag associated with automatically
captured parameters as part of the handover
dataset.
xxxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
VitalPACHD
92Users can view documentation used for
handover containing trends of observations.
Important in settings such as Theatre, ITU, HDU.ITU chart used in one-to-one nursing handover.xxxxxxxObservation
James FoneJames FoneHD
93Users can include audio or video information
as part of the documentation used in handover.
In some contexts asynchronous handover (or
partly asynchronous handover) is carried out using
audio recording. This has some disadvantages,
but may be useful in some circumstances. Audio
and video documentation may also be an
important part of the ‘normal’ patient record, e.g. a
video of surgery.
Nurses in intensive care can record short audio
summaries for patient handover in situations
where there is not time to have a full written
documentation-supported handover.
xxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
102Users can view historical values for information
during handover.
Though the handover documentation will focus on
the ‘current’ values for information (e.g. what ward
is this patient on), it will be useful to discover
previous values for the same data item (e.g. what
ward were they on last week).
If a patient’s test values are of interest during a
handover, users can access previous test
values as opposed to just the most recent ones.
xxxxxxxUser researchHenry
Dowlen
HD
109Users are encouraged to clarify ambiguous
information used in handover.
Users RECEIVING handover in particular should
be encouraged to clarify ambiguous information
with the user handing over.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
117Users can view information displayed in a
consistent way (e.g. order) per type of item
(e.g. a patient). This may vary per type of item
and on handover context.
In the list of summaries for handover, each
patient has their data fields displayed in the
same order e.g. name, DOB, health issue,
tasks, etc.
xxxxxxUser researchJfoneHD
120Users can mark a patient for discharge without
that patient actually being ‘discharged’ on the
system.
Part of a patient’s plan may be whether they are
going to be discharged from a care setting in the
near future. Currently, paper patient lists used in
handover are used to mark which patients may be
discharged.
xxxxxxxUser researchA62HD
121Users can view the empty beds within a set of
beds e.g. a ward (where appropriate).
Empty beds per ward is featured on an existing
handover system. It is also an implicit feature of
paper patient lists and ward whiteboards.
xxxxxxxUser researchJfoneHD
122Users can view the summary information used
in handover as a ‘clean’ set of data that allows
them to clearly identify the most current
information. This is not necessarily the default
view of the information.
It is likely that for handover, users will need to see
’old’ information as well as the most current. For
example it is important to be able to see what
tasks have been done as well as those still to do.
However, this ‘old’ information may clutter the
documentation so, for clarity possible solutions
are: 1) It may be temporarily hidden, 2)
Completed information is removed to an easily
accessible place in the documentation, leaving the
most current information. Relates to RID 104.
If completed tasks remain on a patient’s
’current’ task list (either for a preset period of
time or until they are manually removed), the
completed tasks can be ‘hidden’ temporarily.
xxxxxxxUser researchJames
Fone
HD
128Users can view the handover summary and the
’full’ information per item unfiltered, that is, not
filtered to a particular user’s role-based view.

Assumption is that users will view the information
used in handover (whether a summary or full
information) from a particular perspective e.g. a
nursing view. However it must be possible to be
able to see an unfiltered view, that is, everything.
Related to the requirement to be able to do this for
tasks. As to which should be the default view - it
has not been defined.
xxxxxxx
129Users can view and record information outside
of a pre-determined dataset (if a dataset
applies to their handover information).
May be free text, or options to add new items to
the dataset ‘ad hoc’.
xxxxxx
131Users can handover using datasets defined by
their lead clinician (or equivalent).
xxxxxx
134Users are encouraged to check information for
any ‘automatic’ information population of the
documentation used in handover to avoid data
duplication.
xxxxxxxx
137Users can view and record a patient’s
resuscitation status. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
xxxxxxx
138Users can clearly understand the goals for
patients. (EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
xxxxxxx
141Users can view provenance for information
such as when it was last updated.
Col3Col4xCol6Col7Col8xxxxCol13xCol15Col16Col17Col18Col19Col20Col21xCol23Col24Col25Col26Col27Col28Col29Col30
145Users can view a series of handover
’snapshots’ for an individual patient within their
record, so that the handover sequence can be
reviewed and audited in relation to the
management of the individual patient.
xxxxxxx
146Users can view generic clinical information
related to local procedures, protocols and
guidelines
Needs to have good generic information such as a
broad context for the patient group, e.g.. All
surgical patients in hospital
Access to local protocols and procedures
Emergency procedures, e.g. what to do in case of
fire, violence, etc.
xxxxxxxMeeting
u
dience reviewdience reviewIL
EXAMPLE DATASET PARTEXAMPLE DATASET PART
11Users can clearly and uniquely identify patients
using standard NHS patient identifiers.
(EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
There needs to be clear identification of which
patient is being handed-over in both the
documentation used in handover and any verbal
handover. NHS standards on patient identification
should be followed here.
Possible set: (full name, dob, NHS number,
location)
xxxxxxxxxMeetingV1HD
25Users can view and record the item’s current
location. (EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
Which ward and bed a patient is in.xxxxxxxUser researchV4, L45HD
49Users can view and record patient
demographics and attributes that make up a
unique patient identifier. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
Name, dob, location, contact details, next of kin,
NHS number, photo, bar coding.

x
xxxxxxxDocument reviewAllHD
50Users can view and record a patient’s current
medical problems. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
Nursing care plans, medical plans.xxxxxxxDocument reviewA2,9,20,2
7,29,51,7
1
DAS
89Users can identify the clinician ‘currently
responsible for’ a patient as well as the
consultant who has overall responsibility for
them. (EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
In hospital, patients are usually marked as under
the responsibility of a particular consultant.
However, other members of staff may want to
contact the member of staff who is actually looking
after that patient at a particular time such as the
on-call doctor.
xxxxxxxWorkshopHD
137Users can view and record a patient’s
resuscitation status. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
xxxxxxx
138Users can clearly understand the goals for
patients. (EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
xxxxxxx
HANDSHAKEHANDSHAKE
12Users are clear about who has responsibility
for the items involved in handover, during and
after the handover, especially at the point that
responsibility is transferred. An item cannot be
’no-ones’ responsibility.
User’s care is clear about who is responsible for
the items being handed over (e.g. patient’s) at all
stages. Relates to generic requirement 64.
xxxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
20Users must record the handover event and the
transfer of responsibility (the ‘handshake’). The
documentation of this is clear to all users
involved in the handover. Users can still record
this even if the handover is: 1) asynchronous,
or 2) synchronous but not face to face.
The transfer of responsibility is documented, and
the handover event is documented (assuming that
these are the same thing). Though handovers in
general should be synchronous and face to face,
in some situations this is not possible. In these
situations a documented transfer of responsibility
must still occur.
GP out of hours at night sees a patient and
needs to let the regular day time GP know the
events in the morning. Currently a fax is used,
but it could be an email with read receipt.
xxxxMeetingCUIHD
22The user receiving the handover is in control of
the transfer of responsibility in the handover.
The transfer of responsibility can only occur once
the user receiving the handover is happy to take
responsibility.
In some situations in air traffic control, the user
giving handover cannot leave until the user
receiving handover physically takes
responsibility by removing the outgoing user’s
headphones.
xxxMeetingCUIHD
27At the handover events and transfer of
responsibility, users must record / confirm:
date, time, place, user handing over, user
being handed over to, other users present,
satisfaction (or otherwise) with the handover.
It is likely that much of this information would be
automatically captured by the system and
therefore would not need to be entered by the
users, only confirmed.
xxxMeetingCUIHD
30Users are not inhibited in further patient care
even if the handover process is incomplete.
Handover may not happen/be incomplete or late -
users must still be able to care for the patient and
use the patient’s record even if this is the case.
(The incomplete process should be documented).
If handover cannot take place and therefore is
not documented, users are not locked out of
that patient’s record until the handover has been
accepted.
xxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
31Where a handover is unsatisfactory (e.g.
incorrect/late/incomplete), users can record
this, and the details of why it was not
satisfactory. This is possible retrospectively,
with a clear indicator and a time/date/user
stamp.
Handover may not happen/be brief, incorrect or
late - system must not inhibit patient care if this is
the case, but must accept a retrospective note to
record why. This note could apply to the handover
episode as a whole or to a particular patient’s
handover.
xxxxxMeetingCUIHD
36Users can handover items (e.g. patients or
tasks for patients) outside of a designated
’handover’ time. Handover initiation and
acceptance works as usual.
Handover will not just occur at shift handovers or
main ‘handover events’. Smaller ad-hoc handovers
such as for one task must be possible, as well as
the effective management of this handover.

For jobs that occur during a shift that a nurse
needs to let another nurse or a doctor know that
they need doing, there needs to be a system for
distributing, tracking and completing the task.
xxxxxUser researchV11HD
38Users can handover satisfactorily in
exceptional circumstances, such as when no
documentation has been completed.
Ambulance services transferring someone
acutely before documentation has been done.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
64Users are clear, at all times, who has
responsibility for an item (such as a patient).
Generic version of RID 12.Col4Col5Col6xCol8xxxxCol13Col14Col15xCol17Col18Col19xCol21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26User researchLASCol29HD
87Users giving or receiving handover can refuse
to transfer / accept transfer of responsibility.
This is recorded in the same way as the
handover event & ‘handshake’
A user giving handover can refuse to transfer
responsibility to another user, and a user receiving
handover can refuse to accept responsibility. This
must be documented, though a handover has not
taken place.
A ward nurse refuses to accept a patient from
recovery due to continued bleeding.
xxxWorkshopHD
115Users can have ad-hoc handovers (where
appropriate). Ad-hoc handovers may have
extra requirements to scheduled handovers.
Some contexts have many ad-hoc handovers
more often than scheduled handovers. The
mechanism for initiation (and awareness of) ad-
hoc handover has greater importance than for
scheduled handover.
Paramedic handover to A&E staff is ad-hoc.
Paramedics need to alert A&E staff that they
need to handover a patient.
xxxxUser researchNATSHD
116Users in handover can view the same
handover documentation whether they are co-
located or not.
Handover in some contexts may have to occur
over the phone. The same documentation used in
handover needs to be available to both users.
xxxxxUser researchL5HD
118Users can ‘externally’ monitor the
documentation of the handover event. Users
who were not present at the handover can
understand what took place (users may not be
physically located at the place the handover is
taking place, or they could miss it altogether).
Some users such as senior staff on call may want
to monitor the status of their team and the status
of the items under the responsibility of their team.
This can be done by being able to monitor both the
documentation used in handover and the
documentation of the handover event (including
’handshake’). Relates to RID 18.

A consultant on call can access the handover
summary via the internet.
xxxxxxxUser researchLASHD
139Users can flag unsatisfactory handovers as
incidents. These are dealt with appropriately.
xxx
TASK MANAGEMENTTASK MANAGEMENT
10Users can ‘discharge’ a patient from the
system, even if that patient has outstanding
tasks. These outstanding tasks are identified
and flagged by the system so that they can be
handled appropriately by the health
professional organising patient’s discharge.
Patients may leave a clinical location with certain
tasks intentionally not completed. The system
needs to allow for patients to move location (which
may be outside of the system). Decision support
should operate on these tasks, and incomplete
tasks should be handled appropriately e.g. as an
outpatient.
Patient is to be discharged from the ward
without a social services appointment having
been finalised. The staff will arrange this
appointment after the patient has left.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
18Users can monitor the documentation used in
handover when they are physically away from
the place of handover and the items being
handed over. Remote users can also be aware
of items they have been made responsible for
while located elsewhere
Some users may want to remotely monitor the
items that are under the responsibility of their team
or that might be/have been their responsibility.
This can be done by being able to monitor both the
documentation used in handover. Relates to RID
118. They will also need to be able to be aware of
items that they have become responsible for e.g.
new tasks.


A paediatric SHO working down in A&E wants
to be able to monitor the patients on the
children’s ward and to see if they have been
allocated any tasks in their absence from the
ward.
xxxxxxxObservationV3, V4HD
21Users can record which user marked a task as
complete. With the option for more information
e.g. who vouched for this.
Task management. Who marked a task as
complete is important, however they may not be
the user who actually completed it (or vouched for
it to be complete).
xxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
23Users can schedule their own or others’ tasks
based on the priorities identified during the
handover.
Categorising patients into groups, based on
who needs to be seen first on-call.
xxxxxxInferredV4HD
33Users can easily and quickly make updates to
information during handover (including tasks).
These updates are reflected in the patient’s
record.
Users need to be able to add tasks and change
information during the handover without overly
disrupting the handover. Any changes made to the
information must be part of the ‘source’ information
and not solely made on a ‘handover copy’ of it. If it
is too arduous to add a task at handover it may
lead users to resorting to paper notes.

On-call is often the time when the most difficult
patients to handover are those that are sick and
have just arrived, and may not be on the
computer system/list. Therefore key information
may be disseminated verbally at handover
which is not currently written. It would be useful
to capture this.
xxxxxxxInferredV4HD
34Depending on context, users can view
documentation for handover that is continually
up to date.
Though it will be useful if documentation used in
handover is as up to date as the situation allows,
in some contexts there will be extra importance
attached to having a ‘real-time’ view on the set of
information. A continually updated view may of
course be useful for things other than handover.
Some clinical areas require an ad-hoc handover
resource which is up-to-date all the time, current
examples include a shared whiteboard or an
annotated ward list. These form the basis of
handovers.
Ward whiteboards currently fulfil this function in
hospitals (A&E and labour wards often have
more detail). Communal patient lists such as
handover diaries may attempt to provide a
similar function.
xxxxxxxxxUser researchV9HD
44Users can view all planned tasks for a patient.Nursing care plan. Requirement for prep for
theatres etc.
xxxxxxxxDocument reviewA1,23,4,5,
7,9,20,27,
29,51,71
DAS
51Users can allocate and record tasks to
particular sets of individuals (e.g. jobs for the
on-call team).
Role based, speciality based, shift based tasks.xxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
52Users can allocate and record tasks to a
particular individual (e.g. task for on call doctor
Dr X).
This could be a specific role or a specific person.xxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
53Users are alerted to overdue tasks e.g.
overdue medication administration.
xxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
54Users can highlight tasks specifically for
handover, rather than the job being
permanently highlighted.
Users may need to draw attention to particular
tasks but not have those tasks permanently
highlighted.
We must do this job….(??)xxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
56Users are able to log incomplete tasks.Col3Col4Col5xCol7Col8xxxxCol13Col14Col15Col16xCol18Col19Col20xCol22Col23Col24Col25Col26ObservationJames
Fone
Col29HD
57Users can have allocated tasks integrated into
their diary management systems.
A nurse/doctor should be able to pick up tasks
from another member of staff and have them
directly transferred into their own diary
management system.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIDAS
60Users can view an item’s status with regard to
a context-specific checklist reflecting agreed
guidelines and procedures (e.g. a patient on a
care pathway). This includes functionality
around these checklists such as recording
additional information and highlighting
exceptions.
Context-specific checklists reflecting agreed
guidelines and procedures.
The position of a patient on a care pathway for
day surgery; what checks have been done on
the patient, what checks are still to be done, are
there any exceptions from the expected
pathway, etc.
xxxxxxxxMeetingCUICUIHD
75Users can unambiguously interpret the status
of a task (e.g. completed, partially completed,
incomplete, etc). This status may have further
values that are yet to be defined
Defining an unambiguous status may be very
difficult in practice, (e.g. should completed tasks
be shown? If so which ones?), but is crucial to
good clinical management. Some tasks may have
several important more detailed states which may
be necessary to reflect e.g., bloods taken, sent,
processing, finished but not checked, checked,
checked and acted on, checked and ‘signed’, etc.
xxxxxxWorkshopL49HD
83Users can view and record tasks that are not
associated with a patient.
Not all tasks will be to do with patients.Nursing job to check the resus trolley on the
ward.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
85Users can highlight and prioritise patients and
non-patient tasks. Tasks can be highlighted
and prioritised WITHIN a patient’s dataset.
Patients may need to be highlighted in order to
indicate priority. Non-patient tasks are OK to be
prioritised. Patent-related task prioritisation could
be dangerous, therefore the patients need to be
prioritised first, followed by prioritisation of task for
each patient.
Patients requiring review, urgent investigations,
urgent results awaited, review before discharge.
xxxxxxxxxxWorkshopHD
90Users can filter tasks to show those allocated
for a particular: role /speciality/individual staff
member /set of staff.
Assumptions that ‘by default’ tasks are
multidisciplinary, but can be filtered on various
parameters. Users in specific roles can see which
tasks apply to their role only but also to others’
roles/individuals/groups. See also RID 126 and 14.
Role based, speciality based, shift based tasks.xxxxxxWorkshopHD
98Users can record and view tasks that are
interdependent.
Check bloods before increasing medication
dose.
xxxxxxUser researchL8HD
104Users must ‘manually remove’ tasks and items
from being current in the system. For example,
completed tasks are not automatically archived
or removed once their due date has past. User
intervention is required to remove and sign off
tasks.
If the documentation used in handover represents
a view of information that is broadly ‘current’ then
’old’ information must somehow be removed from
the current view (into some representation of the
past). To ensure that users have acknowledged
tasks and items these must be ‘manually removed’
from the current view, rather than automatically
removed. Relates to RID 122.
xxxxxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
122Users can view the summary information used
in handover as a ‘clean’ set of data that allows
them to clearly identify the most current
information. This is not necessarily the default
view of the information.
It is likely that for handover, users will need to see
’old’ information as well as the most current. For
example it is important to be able to see what
tasks have been done as well as those still to do.
However, this ‘old’ information may clutter the
documentation so, for clarity possible solutions
are: 1) It may be temporarily hidden, 2)
Completed information is removed to an easily
accessible place in the documentation, leaving the
most current information. Relates to RID 104.
If completed tasks remain on a patient’s
’current’ task list (either for a preset period of
time or until they are manually removed), the
completed tasks can be ‘hidden’ temporarily.
xxxxxxxUser researchJames
Fone
HD
123Users can add tasks with a time dependency
e.g. tomorrow, next week, after the operation.
Users need to be able to see whether tasks are
supposed to be done ASAP or at a later time.
Patient needs another scan in 5 days time.xxxxxx
124Users can add (and manage) tasks for items
that are not currently in the location dealt with
in the handover.
Patient who is coming in next week will need a
blood test before their operation.
xxxxxxx
125Users can reallocate sets of tasks to different
users. This should be reflected in the
respective task/diary management systems.
A nurse picks up the tasks from a member for
staff who has had to go home unwell, these are
transferred into their own diary.
xxx
126Users view all an item’s tasks by default (e.g.
at a multidisciplinary level).
Related to RID 90.xxxxxx
132Senior users (e.g. ward managers,
consultants) can check whether tasks relating
to a set of patients or a set of staff have been
completed. For example, they can see if any
medication administrations are outstanding on
a ward.
xxxxxx
140Users can view and record status for non-
patient items such as messages.
Items such as “can someone clean the fish
tank” and “beware the fish tank is leaking badly”
may need to have status e.g. ‘acknowledged’ /
‘completed’.
xxxxxxx
TIME COMPONENTTIME COMPONENT
23Users can schedule their own or others’ tasks
based on the priorities identified during the
handover.
Categorising patients into groups, based on
who needs to be seen first on-call.
xxxxxxInferredV4HD
34Depending on context, users can view
documentation for handover that is continually
up to date.
Though it will be useful if documentation used in
handover is as up to date as the situation allows,
in some contexts there will be extra importance
attached to having a ‘real-time’ view on the set of
information. A continually updated view may of
course be useful for things other than handover.
Some clinical areas require an ad-hoc handover
resource which is up-to-date all the time, current
examples include a shared whiteboard or an
annotated ward list. These form the basis of
handovers.
Ward whiteboards currently fulfil this function in
hospitals (A&E and labour wards often have
more detail). Communal patient lists such as
handover diaries may attempt to provide a
similar function.
Col5Col6xCol8xxxxCol13xCol15Col16xxCol19xCol21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26User researchV9Col29HD
40Users can view ‘snapshots’ of the
documentation used in handover at certain
points of handover from the past. (Time slicing
of documentation).
Currently some handover documentation is in
page-by-page diaries that allow the user to look
back at past handover summaries at particular
times.
xxxxxxWorkshopL49HD
42If ‘non-current’ (i.e. past or future) views of
information used in handover are possible,
users can clearly identify the date and time
they refer to. Particularly important when
looking at handover ‘snapshots’ over time.
Related to RID 40.xxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
44Users can view all planned tasks for a patient.Nursing care plan. Requirement for prep for
theatres etc.
xxxxxxxxDocument reviewA1,23,4,5,
7,9,20,27,
29,51,71
DAS
48Users can view the handover ‘snapshots’ from
previous handover events at either a multi-
patient level, or an individual patient level within
a patient’s record.

Views of the handover documentation at a
handover point (handover snapshots) can be
viewed at a multi-patient level. In addition, from
within a patient’s record, users can view the
handover snapshots for that patient.
xxxxxxDocument reviewA51DAS
57Users can have allocated tasks integrated into
their diary management systems.
A nurse/doctor should be able to pick up tasks
from another member of staff and have them
directly transferred into their own diary
management system.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIDAS
60Users can view an item’s status with regard to
a context-specific checklist reflecting agreed
guidelines and procedures (e.g. a patient on a
care pathway). This includes functionality
around these checklists such as recording
additional information and highlighting
exceptions.
Context-specific checklists reflecting agreed
guidelines and procedures.
The position of a patient on a care pathway for
day surgery; what checks have been done on
the patient, what checks are still to be done, are
there any exceptions from the expected
pathway, etc.
xxxxxxxxMeetingCUICUIHD
91Users can view patient observations that have
been electronically captured and automatically
populated in the system. Automatic alerts can
be associated with parameters.
Increasingly, patient observations are being
captured electronically and can be fed into patient
records and monitored remotely. Documentation
used in handover may utilise these is some
situations.
There is an existing handover system that has
an alert flag associated with automatically
captured parameters as part of the handover
dataset.
xxxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
VitalPACHD
92Users can view documentation used for
handover containing trends of observations.
Important in settings such as Theatre, ITU, HDU.ITU chart used in one-to-one nursing handover.xxxxxxxObservation
James FoneJames FoneHD
97Users can view the information used in
handover in a time-based format (e.g. diary
format).
To allow work planning for a shift or community
work
Some wards have day-by-day diaries to record
patients and jobs.
xxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
100Users can easily refer to information about
previous handover events and information
used in previous handovers.
Users may want to be able to find out ‘old’
information about an item such as “what happened
with this patient yesterday?” or “have they had any
bloods done?”. This may include information about
the handover itself e.g. was it completed
successfully.
xxxxxxUser researchL15HD
102Users can view historical values for information
during handover.
Though the handover documentation will focus on
the ‘current’ values for information (e.g. what ward
is this patient on), it will be useful to discover
previous values for the same data item (e.g. what
ward were they on last week).
If a patient’s test values are of interest during a
handover, users can access previous test
values as opposed to just the most recent ones.
xxxxxxxUser researchHenry
Dowlen
HD
125Users can reallocate sets of tasks to different
users. This should be reflected in the
respective task/diary management systems.
A nurse picks up the tasks from a member for
staff who has had to go home unwell, these are
transferred into their own diary.
xxx
145Users can view a series of handover
’snapshots’ for an individual patient within their
record, so that the handover sequence can be
reviewed and audited in relation to the
management of the individual patient.
xxxxxxx
ITEM LISTSITEM LISTS
8Users can view all of the items that they are
responsible for.
Relates to RID 63. Includes: items (e.g. patients),
regular tasks, specific tasks.
xxxxxxUser researchL5HD
10Users can ‘discharge’ a patient from the
system, even if that patient has outstanding
tasks. These outstanding tasks are identified
and flagged by the system so that they can be
handled appropriately by the health
professional organising patient’s discharge.
Patients may leave a clinical location with certain
tasks intentionally not completed. The system
needs to allow for patients to move location (which
may be outside of the system). This is to prevent
users from falsely marking the tasks as completed
in order to discharge them. Decision support
should operate on these tasks, and incomplete
tasks should be handled appropriately e.g. as an
outpatient.
Patient is to be discharged from the ward
without a social services appointment having
been finalised. The staff will arrange this
appointment after the patient has left.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
14Users can view the documentation used in
handover from the point of view of other users,
e.g. nurses can see a doctor’s view of the
handover information.
When there is handover between two roles,
agendas and views about the patient may differ, in
some cases considerably. Both users will need to
be aware of the other’s perspective. Related to
RID 90. Doctors and nurses often look at, and use
each other’s handover documents to help them
structure their work and communicate.
Handover between two roles. A junior doctor
being able to apply their consultant’s summary
view on the same set of in-patients during a
hospital stay, in order to assess whether they
have done the necessary tasks.
Col5Col6xCol8xxxxCol13xCol15Col16Col17Col18xxCol21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26User researchV2, L45Col29HD
24Users can categorise patients into groups
based on different variables e.g. location,
team, severity.
This does not necessarily mean ‘grouping by’; the
groups could be separate lists and so on.
Various scales (e.g. MEWS, Waterlow),
responsibilities, geography, resuscitation status,
awaiting results, due for admission, due for
discharge, others’ responsibility and so on.
xxxxxxxInferredV4HD
45Users can view the documentation used in
handover in single or multi-patient views.
Multi-patient view: Night doctor covering a
number of patients. Single patient view:
information required to hand a patient over from
one area to another, e.g. from theatre to
recovery.
xxxxxxDocument reviewA53DAS
58Users can view an accurate, up to date list of
patients (or items) that they are responsible
for.
There may be patients who need handing over
who have left hospital/are under the care of a
different team/died/have not come in, but who do
not appear on the ward (for example) yet.
xxxxxxWorkshopL49HD
63User can view all the items they are
responsible for as a ‘single’ list.
Relates to RID 8.xxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
71Users are encouraged to handover items (e.g.
patients) in order of priority.
Relates to RID 23 & 106. Contradicts RID 127.xxxxUser researchNATSHD
82Users can easily determine which items have
been handed over and which are left to
handover.
A ‘handed over’ status icon. Items can be
physically referenced such as the paper strips
used in Air Traffic Control.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
84Users can view and record handover
information for items that do not conform to the
standard physical locations dealt with. For
example, patients who are in a corridor instead
of in a ward bed, patients on the way to A&E,
outpatients.
Occasionally, items (e.g. patients) will not conform
to the standard location categories. If this happens
the users should still be able to view and record
the normal information about the items using the
documentation used in handover. This might
include items without a fixed location or items that
have not yet arrived at the site of care.
In an emergency all of the usual bed locations
are full and patients have to be kept in beds in
the corridor.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
85Users can highlight and prioritise patients and
non-patient tasks. Tasks can be highlighted
and prioritised WITHIN a patient’s dataset.
Patients may need to be highlighted in order to
indicate priority. Non-patient tasks are OK to be
prioritised. Patent-related task prioritisation could
be dangerous, therefore the patients need to be
prioritised first, followed by prioritisation of task for
each patient.
Patients requiring review, urgent investigations,
urgent results awaited, review before discharge.
xxxxxxxxxxWorkshopHD
104Users must ‘manually remove’ tasks and items
from being current in the system. For example,
completed tasks are not automatically archived
or removed once their due date has past. User
intervention is required to remove and sign off
tasks.
If the documentation used in handover represents
a view of information that is broadly ‘current’ then
’old’ information must somehow be removed from
the current view (into some representation of the
past). To ensure that users have acknowledged
tasks and items these must be ‘manually removed’
from the current view, rather than automatically
removed. Relates to RID 122.
xxxxxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
106Users can view items to handover - displayed
in an appropriate order by default for their
context (e.g. bed no, priority, time to be seen
etc).
Relates to RID 23 & 106. Contradicts RID 127.Ward patient lists are usually ordered by bed
number.
xxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
119Users have an indication of items that have
recently left the area of responsibility (e.g.
patients who have been discharged), and
access to information about them.
xxxxxxUser researchNATSHD
120Users can mark a patient for discharge without
that patient actually being ‘discharged’ on the
system.
Part of a patient’s plan may be whether they are
going to be discharged from a care setting in the
near future. Currently, paper patient lists used in
handover are used to mark which patients may be
discharged.
xxxxxxxUser researchA62HD
121Users can view the empty beds within a set of
beds e.g. a ward (where appropriate).
Empty beds per ward is featured on an existing
handover system. It is also an implicit feature of
paper patient lists and ward whiteboards.
xxxxxxxUser researchJfoneHD
124Users can add (and manage) tasks for items
that are not currently in the location dealt with
in the handover.
Patient who is coming in next week will need a
blood test before their operation.
xxxxxxx
127Users are encouraged to handover items in a
consistent order irrespective of the situation
(e.g. bed order).
Contradicts RID 71. Related to RID 106 and 23.Ward patients are usually handed over in bed
number order.
xxxxx
128Users can view the handover summary and the
’full’ information per item unfiltered, that is, not
filtered to a particular user’s role-based view.

Assumption is that users will view the information
used in handover (whether a summary or full
information) from a particular perspective e.g. a
nursing view. However it must be possible to be
able to see an unfiltered view, that is, everything.
Related to the requirement to be able to do this for
tasks. As to which should be the default view - it
has not been defined.
xxxxxxx
130Users can filter the list of items (e.g. patients)
displayed so as to show only ‘problem’ items.
Though by default a user may see all of the items
that they are responsible for, for the sake of clarity
it may be necessary to view only those items that
are problematic or need attending to e.g. unstable
patients.
A doctor working in hospital over the weekend
can filter a list of 400 patients that they are
responsible for over the whole hospital, to a list
of 20 who are unstable and require regular
review.
Col5Col6xCol8xxxxCol13Col14Col15Col16Col17Col18xCol20Col21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26Col27Col28Col29Col30
133Users can view and record information about
patients that are not yet formally ‘on the
system’ since they have only just become
relevant.
A patient is coming in by ambulance but no
details are known about them apart from their
injury. So they are: 1) Not in the area of
responsibility yet 2) Cannot be uniquely
identified on the system.
xxxxxx
136Users can clearly differentiate and filter to
patients admitted during the previous shift. (Or
some other pre-defined time period).
xxxxxx
140Users can view and record status for non-
patient items such as messages.
Items such as “can someone clean the fish
tank” and “beware the fish tank is leaking badly”
may need to have status e.g. ‘acknowledged’ /
‘completed’.
xxxxxxx
144Users can clearly see the inclusion criteria for
the list of items in the documentation used in
handover. For example: all surgical patients, all
paediatric patients, all ITU patients.
xxxxxx
146Users can view generic clinical information
related to local procedures, protocols and
guidelines
Needs to have good generic information such as a
broad context for the patient group, e.g.. All
surgical patients in hospital
Access to local protocols and procedures
Emergency procedures, e.g. what to do in case of
fire, violence, etc.
xxxxxxxMeeting
u
dience reviewdience reviewIL
GOOD PRACTICEGOOD PRACTICE
6Users can view the information used in
handover on a variety of sizes and types of
Display.
xxxxxxUser researchL2, L3, V1HD
7Data is displayed according to the relevant
NHS data standards, e.g. format for date
display.
Some data will have NHS standards that apply to
how it is displayed e.g. patient name, date of birth
and so on. Data displayed for use in handover
must conform to these standards.
CUI date display.xxxxxxObservationV1HD
9All users can update the documentation used
in handover, during handover. In addition,
these updates should be reflected in the patient
record, i.e. in the source data.

Users giving, receiving and present in handover
may need to update the documentation used in
handover. The degree to how simultaneous this is
must be further defined. As usual, these updates
are performed on the ‘source data’ not just a
’handover copy’.
xxxxxMeetingCUIHD
11Users can clearly and uniquely identify patients
using standard NHS patient identifiers.
(EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
There needs to be clear identification of which
patient is being handed-over in both the
documentation used in handover and any verbal
handover. NHS standards on patient identification
should be followed here.
Possible set: (full name, dob, NHS number,
location)
xxxxxxxxxMeetingV1HD
12Users are clear about who has responsibility
for the items involved in handover, during and
after the handover, especially at the point that
responsibility is transferred. An item cannot be
’no-ones’ responsibility.
User’s care is clear about who is responsible for
the items being handed over (e.g. patient’s) at all
stages. Relates to generic requirement 64.
xxxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
14Users can view the documentation used in
handover from the point of view of other users,
e.g. nurses can see a doctor’s view of the
handover information.
When there is handover between two roles,
agendas and views about the patient may differ, in
some cases considerably. Both users will need to
be aware of the other’s perspective. Related to
RID 90. Doctors and nurses often look at, and use
each other’s handover documents to help them
structure their work and communicate.
Handover between two roles. A junior doctor
being able to apply their consultant’s summary
view on the same set of in-patients during a
hospital stay, in order to assess whether they
have done the necessary tasks.
xxxxxxxxUser researchV2, L45HD
15Users can view information that comes from
any relevant NHS system, that is, NHS/Social
care systems are interoperable.
Data must be immediately transferable/available to
the receiving clinicians once handover has taken
place, and in some cases beforehand.
xxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
18Users can monitor the documentation used in
handover when they are physically away from
the place of handover and the items being
handed over. Remote users can also be aware
of items they have been made responsible for
while located elsewhere
Some users may want to remotely monitor the
items that are under the responsibility of their team
or that might be/have been their responsibility.
This can be done by being able to monitor both the
documentation used in handover. Relates to RID
118. They will also need to be able to be aware of
items that they have become responsible for e.g.
new tasks.


A paediatric SHO working down in A&E wants
to be able to monitor the patients on the
children’s ward and to see if they have been
allocated any tasks in their absence from the
ward.
xxxxxxxObservationV3, V4HD
26Users are supported in having handovers
involving a large group of people from different
roles.
Typically MDT meetings. Relates to RID 1.
Necessary to have adaptable summary of patients
and handover lists.
xxxxxxObservationV4HD
28Users can record information that is uniquely
part of the handover process. This is distinct
from the information that is being handed over.
Users may need to record information about the
reason for the handover, as well as the information
that they are handing over. This information will be
unique to the handover event.
If there is a rationale for a handover such as
”please clean fridge” or “please check bloods
for patient x”.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
30Users are not inhibited in further patient care
even if the handover process is incomplete.
Handover may not happen/be incomplete or late -
users must still be able to care for the patient and
use the patient’s record even if this is the case.
(The incomplete process should be documented).
If handover cannot take place and therefore is
not documented, users are not locked out of
that patient’s record until the handover has been
accepted.
xxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
33Users can easily and quickly make updates to
information during handover (including tasks).
These updates are reflected in the patient’s
record.
Users need to be able to add tasks and change
information during the handover without overly
disrupting the handover. Any changes made to the
information must be part of the ‘source’ information
and not solely made on a ‘handover copy’ of it. If it
is too arduous to add a task at handover it may
lead users to resorting to paper notes.
On-call is often the time when the most difficult
patients to handover are those that are sick and
have just arrived, and may not be on the
computer system/list. Therefore key information
may be disseminated verbally at handover
which is not currently written. It would be useful
to capture this.
Col5Col6xCol8Col9xxCol12Col13xCol15Col16xCol18Col19xCol21xCol23Col24Col25Col26InferredV4Col29HD
34Depending on context, users can view
documentation for handover that is continually
up to date.
Though it will be useful if documentation used in
handover is as up to date as the situation allows,
in some contexts there will be extra importance
attached to having a ‘real-time’ view on the set of
information. A continually updated view may of
course be useful for things other than handover.
Some clinical areas require an ad-hoc handover
resource which is up-to-date all the time, current
examples include a shared whiteboard or an
annotated ward list. These form the basis of
handovers.
Ward whiteboards currently fulfil this function in
hospitals (A&E and labour wards often have
more detail). Communal patient lists such as
handover diaries may attempt to provide a
similar function.
xxxxxxxxxUser researchV9HD
36Users can handover items (e.g. patients or
tasks for patients) outside of a designated
’handover’ time. Handover initiation and
acceptance works as usual.
Handover will not just occur at shift handovers or
main ‘handover events’. Smaller ad-hoc handovers
such as for one task must be possible, as well as
the effective management of this handover.

For jobs that occur during a shift that a nurse
needs to let another nurse or a doctor know that
they need doing, there needs to be a system for
distributing, tracking and completing the task.
xxxxxUser researchV11HD
37Users can collect, analyse and report on the
information relating to the handover event, and
the information used in the handover. This may
be used to plan and allocate resources.
Senior staff can tell how long the handovers are
taking, what proportion are being carried out
unsatisfactorily, how many jobs staff are being
required to do, etc.
xxxUser researchV11, L45HD
38Users can handover satisfactorily in
exceptional circumstances, such as when no
documentation has been completed.
Ambulance services transferring someone
acutely before documentation has been done.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
39Users can update the information before,
during and after handover. These updates are
performed on the patient record.
If a user updates information used in the handover
they update the source of the information - not just
a ‘handover copy’.
Appropriate mechanisms should be in place to
ensure that any additional information input to the
record after the handover, by the giver, is flagged
to the receiver.
For example, adding a task to the ‘master’ task
list for the patient
xxxxxxxUser researchV29HD
46Where there is the suspicion that information
used in handover is incorrect or there are
discrepancies between two sources of
information, users can easily identify which
information is correct or initiate processes to
identify this.
The preparation for handover is often a process of
working out what information is correct e.g. has
the patient had this particular task done yet?
During this, users need to be able to identify which
is the correct (e.g. most up to date) information.
The handover documentation says that the
patient has not had their medication, but their
nurse says that they have.
xxxxxxFocus groupsCUIHD
47All users involved in a handover can read the
documentation used in handover
simultaneously.
The handover information may be communally
displayed on the wall.
xxxxWorkshopL49HD
59Users of different roles, and individuals within
those roles can use the list of items used in
handover as personal ‘tick-lists’.
Once a list of patients has been created, different
users may want to use that list to check-mark
whether they have completed an action in relation
to each of the patients in that list. This may be
actions that are in addition to the formal task
management.
A pharmacist can tick off patients they have
reviewed on the ward, SHOs can tick off
patients that have been seen on the ward
round, physician assistants can tick off the
patients whose records they have checked for
blood test requests.
xxxxxxxWorkshopL49HD
62Users are encouraged to use written
documentation as well as the verbal channel
during handover.
Currently many handovers are purely verbal.
Though verbal handover is useful, supplementing
with written documentation (even just that the
handover has taken place) is a good idea.
There is a list of patients to be handed over that
is communally discussed at the handover.
xxxxxxxUser researchLASHD
64Users are clear, at all times, who has
responsibility for an item (such as a patient).
Generic version of RID 12.xxxxxxxUser researchLASHD
65Users can take account of contextually relevant
handover information structures when verbal
and written information is handed over.

Some contexts use predefined structures to aid
the collation of handover information, the handing
over of information and set the expectations of
those users being handed over to. The
communication of these structures may be made
explicit in the written handover information.
Current usage of structure for handover
information: MIST for paramedics - (made
explicit in handover interface), WEST acronym
in air traffic control shift handover, ‘system’
headings in some nursing shift summary
documentation (e.g. breathing, mobility, etc).
xxxxxxxUser researchLASHD
66Users are able to prepare a summary of
information to be handed over, if necessary,
even if such a summary already exists e.g. if
automatically generated.
Preparing a written summary of handover
information prior to handover even if one is
automatically generated is a loose interpretation of
a handover strategy identified by Patterson et al.
The idea is that automatically generated
summaries do not require users to really think
about the handover data. See RID 79.
Prior to handover users giving handover write a
short summary of the important issues (with the
item’s) they are going to handover.
xxxxxxUser researchLASHD
67Users are encouraged to question the user
handing over.
Interactive questioning is a handover strategy
identified by Patterson et al. With comprehensive,
automatically generated handover documentation
there is a danger that neither side of the handover
seeks to question the data or delve deeper beyond
what is presented.

User handing over says that the patient has
been vomiting quite a lot, the users being
handed over to ask whether this is just after
eating food or continually.
xxxxUser researchNATSHD
68Users can easily identify data missing from the
expected handover dataset for that context.
Especially relevant to users receiving
handover.
Col3The patient’s name, date of birth and number
are missing from a ‘John Doe’ patient still to be
identified after a major trauma incident.
Col5Col6xCol8xxxxCol13xCol15Col16Col17Col18Col19xCol21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26User researchNATSCol29HD
69Users can temporarily alter the ‘richness’ of the
data display in order to bring clarity to salient
details.
Where there is a handover such as in ITU with
a lot of information being transferred, it may be
useful to increase or decrease the level of detail
of that handover, e.g. fading in/out of
observations next to summaries.
xxxxxxxUser researchNATSHD
70Users can initiate or delay the handover if
necessary. This is especially relevant for non-
scheduled handovers.
In paramedic handover to A&E the user handing
over makes a request for handover, this can be
delayed by the user they are trying to handover
to.
xxxxUser researchNATSHD
71Users are encouraged to handover items (e.g.
patients) in order of priority.
Relates to RID 23 & 106. Contradicts RID 127.xxxxUser researchNATSHD
72Users can handover according to information
governance and privacy considerations. That is
to say, is it not easy for other patients to
see/overhear handovers about other patients.

Handovers will usually contain private information
and information which other patients should not
see or hear. Currently handover often has to be
conducted in communal areas due to space
limitation or the fixed location of artefacts used in
handover e.g. a whiteboard. Future handover
should try to minimise the necessity to handover in
places where other patients might overhear.
Communal artefacts such as detailed labour
ward whiteboards are useful for handover (so
should be in private), but also useful to be able
to access very easily (so should be in public
areas). Linked electronic large-scale displays
could allow handover information to be in a
private room, and ward information to be on
public view.
xxxxUser researchLASHD
73Users can review the documentation to be
used in handover, prior to the handover taking
place.
It is good practice that users receiving handover
make themselves aware of the situation before the
handover takes place. Therefore the
documentation to be used in handover should be
available for them to review before the handover.
This documentation may include the equivalent of
’activity logs’.
While waiting for the shift handover to take
place, the nurse can read the observation
charts to get an overall picture of how the
patient has been doing. Once the handover
takes place they can ask questions about the
information they have seen.
xxxUser researchL15HD
76Users see information displayed using symbols
and abbreviations that they can clearly
understand. This implies those in standard use
in the NHS.
Symbols and abbreviations must be clearly
understood by all users. Symbols and
abbreviations may not be NHS data standards but
they should conform to those in use in the NHS.
Mg, Mcg, 3/7, TTO, (?)xxxxxxWorkshopL45HD
78All users are encouraged to take ownership of
the information in the shared documentation
used in handover.
Where documentation used in handover is used
communally e.g. patient records, this should mean
that everyone takes responsibility for it’s accuracy
and for being up to date, rather than nobody. How
this might be achieved is unclear.
xxxxxxxUser researchNATSHD
79Users do not have to duplicate existing
information unnecessarily in order to prepare
for handover. That is to say, information
duplication should be minimised.
When preparing for handover, the duplication of
existing data should be minimised for users.
Where possible, information is ‘automatically
populated’ in documentation used in handover.
Data duplication MAY be necessary if deemed an
appropriate handover strategy (see RID 66).
xxxWorkshopHD
80All users can update the documentation used
in handover simultaneously before, during and
after handover. This does not extend to being
able to update the same bit of data
simultaneously. The clinical application
conventions for update management should be
followed.
Related to RID 9, 33, 39.The outgoing users may have forgotten to add
something and the incoming may want to make
notes on the same patient during handover.
Currently some wards may have handover
documents as shared files on a network, this
means that only one person can update the
document (for all patients on the ward) at a
time.
xxxxxxxWorkshopHD
81Users are encouraged to use standardised
handover processes and information (relevant
to their context).
Although it is inevitable that people will adapt the
system to their own needs, and furthermore NEED
to be able to do this, there should be some
attempt and standardisation through good practice
across the health sector.
Paramedic handover standards.xxxxWorkshopHD
82Users can easily determine which items have
been handed over and which are left to
handover.
A ‘handed over’ status icon. Items can be
physically referenced such as the paper strips
used in Air Traffic Control.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
85Users can highlight and prioritise patients and
non-patient tasks. Tasks can be highlighted
and prioritised WITHIN a patient’s dataset.
Patients may need to be highlighted in order to
indicate priority. Non-patient tasks are OK to be
prioritised. Patent-related task prioritisation could
be dangerous, therefore the patients need to be
prioritised first, followed by prioritisation of task for
each patient.
Patients requiring review, urgent investigations,
urgent results awaited, review before discharge.
xxxxxxxxxxWorkshopHD
86Users are encouraged to have a synchronous
handover.
With accurate, easily accessible, up to date
documentation, users might be discouraged from
having synchronous handovers. However, they
should be encouraged to have synchronous
handovers.
Handover protocols seem a likely way to
encourage synchronous handover. Monitoring of
the handover ‘handshake’ could be a way to
check whether this was happening.
xxxxWorkshopHD
88Users can make personal notes during the
handover. These notes are recorded by the
system, but not necessarily part of any
patient’s record. (Governance)
Some users currently take notes during handover
in order to help them manage/remember
tasks/information. The act of taking notes may
help users remember them, rather than using the
notes as a memory aid. Taking personal notes is
not intended to be a facility for staff to record
information that they want to transfer informally
(e.g. ‘this patient is a nightmare’). Because
personal notes might be used in this way, this
requirement may need to be reconsidered.
xxxxWorkshopHD
91Users can view patient observations that have
been electronically captured and automatically
populated in the system. Automatic alerts can
be associated with parameters.
Increasingly, patient observations are being
captured electronically and can be fed into patient
records and monitored remotely. Documentation
used in handover may utilise these is some
situations.
There is an existing handover system that has
an alert flag associated with automatically
captured parameters as part of the handover
dataset.
xCol6Col7Col8xxxxCol13xCol15Col16Col17xCol19xCol21Col22Col23Col24Col25Col26ObservationHenry
Dowlen
VitalPACHD
93Users can include audio or video information
as part of the documentation used in handover.
In some contexts asynchronous handover (or
partly asynchronous handover) is carried out using
audio recording. This has some disadvantages,
but may be useful in some circumstances. Audio
and video documentation may also be an
important part of the ‘normal’ patient record, e.g. a
video of surgery.
Nurses in intensive care can record short audio
summaries for patient handover in situations
where there is not time to have a full written
documentation-supported handover.
xxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
94Users can use machine-readable identification
to support patient identification.
Bar coding, RFID tags.xxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
96Users can print out aspects of the
documentation used in handover, such as lists
of patients to be handed over. These printouts
will be subject to information governance rules.
Care must be taken that printouts do not
discourage users from using the electronic
documentation.
Currently handover documentation is on paper,
often printed patient lists. This is because of their
mobility and ease of updating. However, paper
lists have considerable disadvantages and
therefore great care must be taken with their use -
users must not be discouraged from viewing or
updating the electronic documentation. In addition,
there should be strict information governance rules
about the use of the printouts e.g. that leaving
them lying around is a disciplinary offence.
xxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
99Users have minimal interruption while handover
is going on.
An ‘intelligent’ messaging system could defer all
non-urgent messages sent to the users involved
in handover until after the handover has
finished.
xxxxUser researchL15HD
101Users are encouraged to establish a leader for
the handover.
It is not clear from the handover literature whether
there should be one leader for the handover, or a
leader for the receiving and a leader for the giving
of handover. A single leader is likely to be the
more practical.
xxxxxxUser researchL15HD
103Users are not be unduly constrained to have a
handover in a fixed place, time and duration.
However, they may be encouraged to do so.
It is good practice to have handovers at a fixed
place, fixed time and for a roughly pre-determined
duration. However it may be necessary to alter
these according to circumstances. Users should
still be able to handover as usual in these differing
circumstances.
Due to an electrical fault, handover has to be
moved to another room. Users involved can be
notified ahead of time and can use another
large screen Display to display the
documentation used in handover.
xxxxxUser researchL25HD
104Users must ‘manually remove’ tasks and items
from being current in the system. For example,
completed tasks are not automatically archived
or removed once their due date has past. User
intervention is required to remove and sign off
tasks.
If the documentation used in handover represents
a view of information that is broadly ‘current’ then
’old’ information must somehow be removed from
the current view (into some representation of the
past). To ensure that users have acknowledged
tasks and items these must be ‘manually removed’
from the current view, rather than automatically
removed. Relates to RID 122.
xxxxxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
105Users are prevented from accidentally
updating the information used in handover.
Generic application requirement.xxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
107For certain handover contexts, users are
discouraged from initiating certain kinds of
actions during the handover as they may
distract the users from handover itself.
During handover, users should be focused on the
handover. With the possibility of being able to
initiate actions at any time (e.g. computerised
order entry), users may be tempted to carry out
actions while the handover is ongoing. In some
circumstances users should be encouraged to
focus on the handover as opposed to immediately
carrying out the actions identified in handover.
Carrying out these actions MAY distract the users
from handover and MAY increase the length of
handover.
If users in handover try to order tests
electronically during shift handover they receive
a warning message reminding them that they
should defer this action until after handover.
This warning message is communally displayed
so that all users in handover can see that the
user is potentially not giving their full attention to
the handover. During some types of handover it
may be advantageous to order tests such as
during a handover on a post-take ward round.
xxxxxUser researchL15HD
108For certain handover contexts, users are
encouraged to ‘read back’ key information to
ensure correctness.
For critical information, ‘read back’ helps ensure
correctness. Certain handover contexts will require
an extra degree of certainty in information handed
over.

Where handover is not face-to-face and two
patients have very similar names on the same
ward, and one patient is not for resuscitation,
the user receiving handover should read back
the name and DNR status of that patient. This
could be encouraged via a reminder prompt.
xxxxxUser researchL15HD
109Users are encouraged to clarify ambiguous
information used in handover.
Users RECEIVING handover in particular should
be encouraged to clarify ambiguous information
with the user handing over.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
110Users can access documentation to be used in
handover that is a single reliable source.
Currently handover is often done using multiple
paper sources of information, therefore it is often
laborious or hard to determine what is the most up
to date information.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
111Users can access the documentation used in
handover at all times and places during their
work.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
112Users can update the documentation used in
handover for items they are responsible for,
e.g. nurses looking after patients update the
documentation for those patients.
The users who are responsible for particular items
update those items in the documentation
themselves; rather than the documentation to be
used in handover being updated by a third party
e.g. a ward manager, or a ‘documentation
administrator’.
Col4Col5Col6xCol8xCol10Col11Col12Col13Col14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19xCol21xCol23Col24Col25Col26ObservationJames
Fone
Col29HD
114Users have access and update control
restricted according to their profile.
xxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
116Users in handover can view the same
handover documentation whether they are co-
located or not.
Handover in some contexts may have to occur
over the phone. The same documentation used in
handover needs to be available to both users.
xxxxxUser researchL5HD
118Users can ‘externally’ monitor the
documentation of the handover event. Users
who were not present at the handover can
understand what took place (users may not be
physically located at the place the handover is
taking place, or they could miss it altogether).
Some users such as senior staff on call may want
to monitor the status of their team and the status
of the items under the responsibility of their team.
This can be done by being able to monitor both the
documentation used in handover and the
documentation of the handover event (including
’handshake’). Relates to RID 18.

A consultant on call can access the handover
summary via the internet.
xxxxxxxUser researchLASHD
127Users are encouraged to handover items in a
consistent order irrespective of the situation
(e.g. bed order).
Contradicts RID 71. Related to RID 106 and 23.Ward patients are usually handed over in bed
number order.
xxxxx
134Users are encouraged to check information for
any ‘automatic’ information population of the
documentation used in handover to avoid data
duplication.
xxxxxxxx
135Users can have information used in handover
forwarded to them.
iBleep system.xxxxxx
142Users can access basic management and
organisational information on hospital
procedures, line management, access to
services, consultant on call, etc.
xxxxxx
143Users can access local clinical processes,
procedures and protocols
xxxxxx
146Users can view generic clinical information
related to local procedures, protocols and
guidelines.
Needs to have good generic information such as a
broad context for the patient group, e.g. all
surgical patients in hospital.
Access to local protocols and procedures,
emergency procedures, e.g. what to do in case of
fire, violence, etc.
xxxxxxxMeeting
u
dience reviewdience reviewIL
147Users can view management information such
as name of their line manager or consultant in
charge.
xxxxMeeting
u
dience reviewdience reviewIL
148Users should be able to use historical data in
resource and human management systems
and for commissioning purposes.
xxxMeeting
u
dience reviewdience reviewIL
ENCOURAGEMENT/DISCOURAGEMENTENCOURAGEMENT/DISCOURAGEMENTENCOURAGEMENT/DISCOURAGEMENT
56Users are able to log incomplete tasksxxxxxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
62Users are encouraged to use written
documentation as well as the verbal channel
during handover.
Currently many handovers are purely verbal.
Though verbal handover is useful, supplementing
with written documentation (even just that the
handover has taken place) is a good idea.
There is a list of patients to be handed over that
is communally discussed at the handover.
xxxxxxxUser researchLASHD
66Users are able to prepare a summary of
information to be handed over, if necessary,
even if such a summary already exists e.g. if
automatically generated.
Preparing a written summary of handover
information prior to handover even if one is
automatically generated is a loose interpretation of
a handover strategy identified by Patterson et al.
The idea is that automatically generated
summaries do not require users to really think
about the handover data. See RID 79.
Prior to handover users giving handover write a
short summary of the important issues (with the
item’s) they are going to handover.
xxxxxxUser researchLASHD
67Users are encouraged to question the user
handing over.
Interactive questioning is a handover strategy
identified by Patterson et al. With comprehensive,
automatically generated handover documentation
there is a danger that neither side of the handover
seeks to question the data or delve deeper beyond
what is presented.

User handing over says that the patient has
been vomiting quite a lot, the users being
handed over to ask whether this is just after
eating food or continually.
xxxxUser researchNATSHD
78All users are encouraged to take ownership of
the information in the shared documentation
used in handover.
Where documentation used in handover is used
communally e.g. patient records, this should mean
that everyone takes responsibility for it’s accuracy
and for being up to date, rather than nobody. How
this might be achieved is unclear.
xxxxxxxUser researchNATSHD
81Users are encouraged to use standardised
handover processes and information (relevant
to their context).
Although it is inevitable that people will adapt the
system to their own needs, and furthermore NEED
to be able to do this, there should be some
attempt and standardisation through good practice
across the health sector.
Paramedic handover standards.xxxxWorkshopHD
86Users are encouraged to have a synchronous
handover.
With accurate, easily accessible, up to date
documentation, users might be discouraged from
having synchronous handovers. However, they
should be encouraged to have synchronous
handovers.
Handover protocols seem a likely way to
encourage synchronous handover. Monitoring of
the handover ‘handshake’ could be a way to
check whether this was happening.
xxxxWorkshopHD
96Users can print out aspects of the
documentation used in handover, such as lists
of patients to be handed over. These printouts
will be subject to information governance rules.
Care must be taken that printouts do not
discourage users from using the electronic
documentation.
Currently handover documentation is on paper,
often printed patient lists. This is because of their
mobility and ease of updating. However, paper
lists have considerable disadvantages and
therefore great care must be taken with their use -
users must not be discouraged from viewing or
updating the electronic documentation. In addition,
there should be strict information governance rules
about the use of the printouts e.g. that leaving
them lying around is a disciplinary offence.
Col4xCol6Col7Col8xxxxCol13Col14Col15Col16Col17Col18Col19xxCol22Col23Col24Col25Col26ObservationHenry
Dowlen
Col29HD
107For certain handover contexts, users are
discouraged from initiating certain kinds of
actions during the handover as they may
distract the users from handover itself.
During handover, users should be focused on the
handover. With the possibility of being able to
initiate actions at any time (e.g. computerised
order entry), users may be tempted to carry out
actions while the handover is ongoing. In some
circumstances users should be encouraged to
focus on the handover as opposed to immediately
carrying out the actions identified in handover.
Carrying out these actions MAY distract the users
from handover and MAY increase the length of
handover.
If users in handover try to order tests
electronically during shift handover they receive
a warning message reminding them that they
should defer this action until after handover.
This warning message is communally displayed
so that all users in handover can see that the
user is potentially not giving their full attention to
the handover. During some types of handover it
may be advantageous to order tests such as
during a handover on a post-take ward round.
xxxxxUser researchL15HD
108For certain handover contexts, users are
encouraged to ‘read back’ key information to
ensure correctness.
For critical information, ‘read back’ helps ensure
correctness. Certain handover contexts will require
an extra degree of certainty in information handed
over.

Where handover is not face-to-face and two
patients have very similar names on the same
ward, and one patient is not for resuscitation,
the user receiving handover should read back
the name and DNR status of that patient. This
could be encouraged via a reminder prompt.
xxxxxUser researchL15HD
109Users are encouraged to clarify ambiguous
information used in handover.
Users RECEIVING handover in particular should
be encouraged to clarify ambiguous information
with the user handing over.
xxxxxxWorkshopHD
127Users are encouraged to handover items in a
consistent order irrespective of the situation
(e.g. bed order).
Contradicts RID 71. Related to RID 106 and 23.Ward patients are usually handed over in bed
number order.
xxxxx
134Users are encouraged to check information for
any ‘automatic’ information population of the
documentation used in handover to avoid data
duplication.
xxxxxxxx
UPDATINGUPDATING
9All users can update the documentation used
in handover, during handover. In addition,
these updates should be reflected in the patient
record, i.e. in the source data.

Users giving, receiving and present in handover
may need to update the documentation used in
handover. The degree to how simultaneous this is
must be further defined. As usual, these updates
are performed on the ‘source data’ not just a
’handover copy’.
xxxxxMeetingCUIHD
33Users can easily and quickly make updates to
information during handover (including tasks).
These updates are reflected in the patient’s
record.
Users need to be able to add tasks and change
information during the handover without overly
disrupting the handover. Any changes made to the
information must be part of the ‘source’ information
and not solely made on a ‘handover copy’ of it. If it
is too arduous to add a task at handover it may
lead users to resorting to paper notes.

On-call is often the time when the most difficult
patients to handover are those that are sick and
have just arrived, and may not be on the
computer system/list. Therefore key information
may be disseminated verbally at handover
which is not currently written. It would be useful
to capture this.
xxxxxxxInferredV4HD
39Users can update the information before,
during and after handover. These updates are
performed on the patient record.
If a user updates information used in the handover
they update the source of the information - not just
a ‘handover copy’.
Appropriate mechanisms should be in place to
ensure that any additional information inputed to
the record after the handover, by the giver, is
flagged to the receiver.
For example, adding a task to the ‘master’ task
list for the patient
xxxxxxxUser researchV29HD
80All users can update the documentation used
in handover simultaneously before, during and
after handover. This does not extend to being
able to update the same bit of data
simultaneously. The clinical application
conventions for update management should be
followed.
Related to RID 9, 33, 39.The outgoing users may have forgotten to add
something and the incoming may want to make
notes on the same patient during handover.
Currently some wards may have handover
documents as shared files on a network, this
means that only one person can update the
document (for all patients on the ward) at a
time.
xxxxxxxWorkshopHD
105Users are prevented from accidentally
updating the information used in handover.
Generic application requirement.xxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
112Users can update the documentation used in
handover for items they are responsible for,
e.g. nurses looking after patients update the
documentation for those patients.
The users who are responsible for particular items
update those items in the documentation
themselves; rather than the documentation to be
used in handover being updated by a third party
e.g. a ward manager, or a ‘documentation
administrator’.
xxxxObservationJames
Fone
HD
114Users have access and update control
restricted according to their profile.
xxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD
141Users can view provenance for information
such as when it was last updated.
xxxxxxx
PATIENT IDENTIFICATIONPATIENT IDENTIFICATION
11Users can clearly and uniquely identify patients
using standard NHS patient identifiers.
(EXAMPLE DATASET PART)
There needs to be clear identification of which
patient is being handed-over in both the
documentation used in handover and any verbal
handover. NHS standards on patient identification
should be followed here.
Possible set: (full name, dob, NHS number,
location)
xCol6Col7Col8xxxxCol13xxCol16Col17Col18Col19xCol21Col22xCol24Col25Col26MeetingV1Col29HD
49Users can view and record patient
demographics and attributes that make up a
unique patient identifier. (EXAMPLE DATASET
PART)
Name, dob, location, contact details, next of kin,
NHS number, photo, bar coding.

x
xxxxxxxDocument reviewAllHD
77Users in certain contexts can use
supplementary patient identifiers in addition to
the standard NHS set.
Not all contexts that clinical handover occurs in
may be able to uniquely identify a patient with
standard NHS identifiers alone. Supplementary
identifiers should be used as appropriate.
Social security number for handover involving
social services.
xxxxxxxMeetingCUIHD
94Users can use machine-readable identification
to support patient identification.
Bar coding, RFID tags.xxxxxxxObservationHenry
Dowlen
HD